Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Marking case as closed |
Archiving case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
|||
=====<big>24 September 2010</big>===== |
|||
{{SPIcat}} |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>====== |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=TungstenCarbide XXVI}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Ks0stm|Ks0stm]] </span>====== |
|||
Another TungstenCarbide sock following the usual naming pattern. Somehow he's managed to create socks 3 times in the last two months, so some sort of IP (possibly range?) block might be useful. Requesting checkuser to determine if an IP block would be feasible, but no hard feelings if the checkuser check is declined. |
|||
Former sockpuppets that would be helpful in determining a range if checkuser is endorsed include the most recent two blocked ones: {{Checkuser|TungstenCarbide XXV}} and {{Checkuser|TungstenCarbide XXIV}}. [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|C]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Guestbook|G]])</sup> 14:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
|||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
|||
*Yes, I am indeed [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=TungstenCarbide&group=&limit=50 TungstenCarbide] and every time I'm blocked I create a new account. It's simply not in your interest to keep blocking me. I don't cause much trouble and the blocking doesn't work. So why bother? Why not just let me have my say? Why the heavy handed censorship? Best regards __[[User:TungstenCarbide XXVI|TungstenCarbide XXVI]] ([[User talk:TungstenCarbide XXVI|talk]]) 14:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== |
|||
{{confirmed}} (obviously), but a the range is too busy for blocking. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 15:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*All blocked up. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ.alt]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]][[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad|<font color="blue">(e)]]</font></font></font> 17:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Revision as of 17:42, 24 September 2010
TungstenCarbide
TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.