User talk:Logicalthinker33: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Its notable that GB do no regard them as leaders.--<span style="border: 2px dashed #FF00CC;">[[User talk:Logicalthinker33|'''<span style="background-color:#F7F7F7; color:#FF00CC"> Logical Thinker </span>''']]</span> 07:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
Its notable that GB do no regard them as leaders.--<span style="border: 2px dashed #FF00CC;">[[User talk:Logicalthinker33|'''<span style="background-color:#F7F7F7; color:#FF00CC"> Logical Thinker </span>''']]</span> 07:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:A statement ostensibly from the Governing Body about how JWs do not regard the Governing Body as leaders is not particularly neutral.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
:A statement ostensibly from the Governing Body about how JWs do not regard the Governing Body as leaders is not particularly neutral.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Are statements from James Penton and Ray Franz against Jehovah's Witnesses neutral? The Wikipedia page accuses JW of many things, and also presents things in a way to offer a counter-Jehovah's Witness viewpoint. Statements such as this are needed to clarify and balance the way that Wikipedia editor's are skewing the "evidence". [[User:Naturalpsychology|Natural]] ([[User talk:Naturalpsychology|talk]]) 18:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Natural |
Revision as of 18:58, 24 September 2010
Logicalthinker33 says that he had quit contributing for Wikipedia-:).
This is Logicalthinker33's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
New book on Acts-GB quote
Quote from Governing Body in new Acts book on how they view themselves, do you have in English? I have only in other language. p. 110 - last sentence.Natural (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Natural
- Of course I have it on English . That publication is not available in my language. Nowadays I hardly get time to work in wiki. I thought you were a native English speaker. The quote is like this I would type it below.
“ | The Governing body relies on God's Holy spirit for direction, Its members do not regard them-selves as the leaders of Jehovah's people. Rather, like all anointed Christians on earth, they "keep following the Lamb[Jesus Christ] no matter where he goes"-Rev. 14:4. | ” |
Its notable that GB do no regard them as leaders.-- Logical Thinker 07:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- A statement ostensibly from the Governing Body about how JWs do not regard the Governing Body as leaders is not particularly neutral.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Are statements from James Penton and Ray Franz against Jehovah's Witnesses neutral? The Wikipedia page accuses JW of many things, and also presents things in a way to offer a counter-Jehovah's Witness viewpoint. Statements such as this are needed to clarify and balance the way that Wikipedia editor's are skewing the "evidence". Natural (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Natural