Talk:IAO (album): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:07, 26 September 2010

Jazz Stub‑class

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move

It has been proposed in this section that IAO (album) be renamed and moved to I.A.O. (John Zorn album).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

I.A.O. → I.A.O. (John Zorn album) — Could be easily confused with any of IAOs Vladislav0 (talk) 22:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and redirect I.A.O. to IAO. Powers ^T 01:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Why not IAO (album)? 「ɠu¹ɖяy」¤ • ¢ 08:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think, it should be redirected namely to I.A.O. (John Zorn album) - as well as other articles about his albums (Elegy (John Zorn album), The Gift (John Zorn album), etc. Vladislav0 (talk) 08:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-support. "I.A.O." is essentially interchangeable with "IAO", so I agree that it should redirect to the dab page. Regarding the album, the article text uses "IAO" which is contrary to the page name, so it could be that IAO (album) would be the prefered move. PC78 (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to clarify, I would support a move to either IAO (album) or I.A.O. (album), whichever is deemed more appropriate, but there is no need to disambiguate the title further as suggested by the nom. PC78 (talk) 09:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - 1. Well, I suppose it should be better to clarify band's (or musician's) name in the article title for future releases. (For example see Lucifer_Rising_(album) and Lucifer_Rising_(Kaamos_album): actually both articles should contain band's (or musician's) name in the brackets.) 2. So, I.A.O. (John Zorn album) or IAO (John Zorn album)? Mea culpa, my mistake - "IAO" without dots is better, because Zorn himself spells it this way (see his label [catalogue page http://www.tzadik.com/index.php?catalog=7338]). But sometimes the title is referred to as "I.A.O." - for this case I could make later redirection page [[I.A.O. (John Zorn album)] (or I.A.O. (album)...)Vladislav0 (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Semi-support'''. "I.A.O." is essentially interchangeable with "IAO", so I agree that it should redirect to the dab page. Regarding the album, the article text uses "IAO" which is contrary to the page name, so it could be that [[IAO (album)]] would be the prefered move. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 12:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 **Just to clarify, I would support a move to either [[IAO (album)]] or [[I.A.O. (album)]], whichever is deemed more appropriate, but there is no need to disambiguate the title further as suggested by the nom. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 09:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
+***1. Well, I suppose it should be better to clarify band's (or musician's) name in the article title for future releases. (For example see [[Lucifer_Rising_(album)]] and [[Lucifer_Rising_(Kaamos_album)]]: actually '''both''' articles should contain band's (or musician's) name in the brackets.) 2. So, [[I.A.O. (John Zorn album)]] or [[IAO (John Zorn album)]]? Mea culpa, my mistake - "IAO" without dots is better, because Zorn himself spells it this way (see his label [catalogue page http://www.tzadik.com/index.php?catalog=7338]). But sometimes the title is referred to as "I.A.O." - for this case I could make later redirection page [[I.A.O. (John Zorn album)] (or [[I.A.O. (album)]]...)[[User:Vladislav0|Vladislav0]] ([[User talk:Vladislav0|talk]]) 18:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)