Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Moran: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
DanielRigal (talk | contribs) speedy keep |
→Caitlin Moran: Keep |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Speedy keep'''. Notable as an award winning journalist, author and former TV presenter. Article could do with expansion and secondary sources but that is no reason to propose deletion. The nominator has also proposed [[Grace Dent]] for deletion on similarly insubstantial grounds. What's the story here? --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 14:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy keep'''. Notable as an award winning journalist, author and former TV presenter. Article could do with expansion and secondary sources but that is no reason to propose deletion. The nominator has also proposed [[Grace Dent]] for deletion on similarly insubstantial grounds. What's the story here? --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 14:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - Well known UK journalist and broadcaster. [[User:Neilplatform1|Neilplatform1]] ([[User talk:Neilplatform1|talk]]) 15:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:26, 28 September 2010
AfDs for this article:
- Caitlin Moran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Is not notable enough to warrant inclusion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Notsofabio (talk • contribs) This template must be substituted.
- Nomination reason was listed on talk page rather than here, copied here --Salix (talk): 21:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Winning a British Press Award establishes her notability. Jimmy Pitt talk 22:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, no substantive justification per WP:AUTHOR. In any event, she is notable for having written for a national newspaper (The Times) at the age of 16, and a journalistic career since. WP:N should be easily established by multiple reliable sources. Rodhullandemu 21:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Quite a well-known Times journalist, even though she's disappeared behind a paywall. I've just linked to her in an article I was writing. Bob talk 08:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Notable as an award winning journalist, author and former TV presenter. Article could do with expansion and secondary sources but that is no reason to propose deletion. The nominator has also proposed Grace Dent for deletion on similarly insubstantial grounds. What's the story here? --DanielRigal (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Well known UK journalist and broadcaster. Neilplatform1 (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)