Jump to content

User talk:Najzeko: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Najzeko (talk | contribs)
September 2010: My appeal
Line 25: Line 25:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I was being stupid and i felt like deleting pages and adding stupid comments, but I used a different account thinking that you would be able to block that one but not the other. I use the "najzeko" account for using wikipedia and actually helping. I try my best to help pages, but most of them are just so good, that the level of information that it provides exceeds my level. Then one day,(about 1 year later) I forgot about all the things I did and I read the article about cells (biology)and this user put a vandalistic edit that said the scientist that was mentioned in the article, was comparing his results with "the rooms that little monks lived in". That inspired me to make something funny on that page and to get a discussion input on it. I did and then 1 week later, I find out I'm blocked indefinitely. That's the whole story of my stupid behaviour on wikipedia. I hope I'm not asking for too much by saying if I could get another chance, because I know you must get thousands of requests every day. I swear I can refrain myself from acting stupid again, and making stupid edits. I'm deeply sorry. --**Najezeko**:) 03:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)|decline=So you're saying that you have another account that you use for vandalism? [[WP:SOCK|That's not really helping your case]]... <span style="font-family:Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</span> 03:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=I was being stupid and i felt like deleting pages and adding stupid comments, but I used a different account thinking that you would be able to block that one but not the other. I use the "najzeko" account for using wikipedia and actually helping. I try my best to help pages, but most of them are just so good, that the level of information that it provides exceeds my level. Then one day,(about 1 year later) I forgot about all the things I did and I read the article about cells (biology)and this user put a vandalistic edit that said the scientist that was mentioned in the article, was comparing his results with "the rooms that little monks lived in". That inspired me to make something funny on that page and to get a discussion input on it. I did and then 1 week later, I find out I'm blocked indefinitely. That's the whole story of my stupid behaviour on wikipedia. I hope I'm not asking for too much by saying if I could get another chance, because I know you must get thousands of requests every day. I swear I can refrain myself from acting stupid again, and making stupid edits. I'm deeply sorry. --**Najezeko**:) 03:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)|decline=So you're saying that you have another account that you use for vandalism? [[WP:SOCK|That's not really helping your case]]... <span style="font-family:Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</span> 03:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|NO, I'm saying that I ''USED'' to have a different account, but if you check, you will see I have not logged on to it ever since I created it. When I said I made a different account thinking that you could only block that one, I meant that it was just a stupid action that I did. Not a threat to start vandalising again. My apologies for not making that clear.

Still sorry,
--**Najezeko**:) 03:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 03:35, 3 October 2010

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Najzeko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Danger (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:Stromatolite. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Wintonian (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Traxs7 04:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Traxs7 04:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Connormah (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Najzeko (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was being stupid and i felt like deleting pages and adding stupid comments, but I used a different account thinking that you would be able to block that one but not the other. I use the "najzeko" account for using wikipedia and actually helping. I try my best to help pages, but most of them are just so good, that the level of information that it provides exceeds my level. Then one day,(about 1 year later) I forgot about all the things I did and I read the article about cells (biology)and this user put a vandalistic edit that said the scientist that was mentioned in the article, was comparing his results with "the rooms that little monks lived in". That inspired me to make something funny on that page and to get a discussion input on it. I did and then 1 week later, I find out I'm blocked indefinitely. That's the whole story of my stupid behaviour on wikipedia. I hope I'm not asking for too much by saying if I could get another chance, because I know you must get thousands of requests every day. I swear I can refrain myself from acting stupid again, and making stupid edits. I'm deeply sorry. --**Najezeko**:) 03:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So you're saying that you have another account that you use for vandalism? That's not really helping your case... Mr.Z-man 03:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Najzeko (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

NO, I'm saying that I USED to have a different account, but if you check, you will see I have not logged on to it ever since I created it. When I said I made a different account thinking that you could only block that one, I meant that it was just a stupid action that I did. Not a threat to start vandalising again. My apologies for not making that clear.

Still sorry,

--**Najezeko**:) 03:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=NO, I'm saying that I ''USED'' to have a different account, but if you check, you will see I have not logged on to it ever since I created it. When I said I made a different account thinking that you could only block that one, I meant that it was just a stupid action that I did. Not a threat to start vandalising again. My apologies for not making that clear. Still sorry, --**Najezeko**:) 03:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=NO, I'm saying that I ''USED'' to have a different account, but if you check, you will see I have not logged on to it ever since I created it. When I said I made a different account thinking that you could only block that one, I meant that it was just a stupid action that I did. Not a threat to start vandalising again. My apologies for not making that clear. Still sorry, --**Najezeko**:) 03:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=NO, I'm saying that I ''USED'' to have a different account, but if you check, you will see I have not logged on to it ever since I created it. When I said I made a different account thinking that you could only block that one, I meant that it was just a stupid action that I did. Not a threat to start vandalising again. My apologies for not making that clear. Still sorry, --**Najezeko**:) 03:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}