User talk:Logicalthinker33: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
archieved |
→Inappropriate edit: new section |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!-- End of Auto archiving setup --> |
<!-- End of Auto archiving setup --> |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
== Inappropriate edit == |
|||
I undid your inappropriate edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Siege_of_Jerusalem_%28587_BC%29&action=historysubmit&diff=388637349&oldid=357894420 here]. The spurious JW chronology is not endorsed by "some historians" as you tried to ambiguously state. Absolutely no independent sources endorse the flawed JW chronology. The 'source' you cite is clearly a personal webpage that fails Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 12:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:33, 4 October 2010
Logicalthinker33 says that he had quit contributing for Wikipedia-:).
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| This is Logicalthinker33's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Inappropriate edit
I undid your inappropriate edit here. The spurious JW chronology is not endorsed by "some historians" as you tried to ambiguously state. Absolutely no independent sources endorse the flawed JW chronology. The 'source' you cite is clearly a personal webpage that fails Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)