Jump to content

Talk:Alfred Pullin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
change need-photo to specific reqphoto using AWB
GimmeBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot updating {{ArticleHistory}}
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{GA|22:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)|topic=Social sciences and society|page=}}
|action1=GAN
|action1date=22:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=383912261
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=Social sciences and society
}}
{{reqphoto|journalists|cricket people}}
{{reqphoto|journalists|cricket people}}
{{WPBiography|living=No|class=GA|priority=|sports-work-group=yes|needs-photo=|listas=Pullin, Alfred}}
{{WPBiography|living=No|class=GA|priority=|sports-work-group=yes|needs-photo=|listas=Pullin, Alfred}}

Revision as of 13:58, 5 October 2010

Good articleAlfred Pullin has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2010Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group.
WikiProject iconCricket GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other
WikiProject iconJournalism GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alfred Pullin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Brad78 (talk) 21:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • One minor issue. Do you think it's worth saying Pullin was Welsh/British in the first line?
Done. Said British rather than Welsh as he had no association with Wales for most of his life. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Early life
  • Do you have any further details about Pullin's aborted rugby career or his refereeing?
No, it was very obscure and not really recorded. Just local stuff. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while this is a moot point regarding the review itself, should this be listed under journalism rather than sport?

Quite possibly, but I had him down as a sports journalist who was firmly associated with cricket. But on reflection, journalism would have made more sense! --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other than those two issues, this is a smashing, little piece. Brad78 (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A short and sweet biography. It's very well-written and remains focused. It any further details come to light, it would be great to expand the article. Similarly the article uses few sources at the moment, so maybe that may help to expand it. Finally, there are no images, but that's not a requirement for GA. Brad78 (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]