Jump to content

User talk:Ai.kefu: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comments invited: new section
Ai.kefu (talk | contribs)
Blanked the page
Line 1: Line 1:
== Solution to Ruled Out Debate NEED YOUR FEEDBACK! ==

Proposed solution to ruled out debate on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_presidential_election,_2012#SOLUTION_TO_RULED_OUT_DEBATE]]. Please submit your feedback. Thanks.
[[User:David1982m|David1982m]] ([[User talk:David1982m|talk]] •

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:V.O.N.]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:V.O.N.]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)|notability guideline for musical topics]]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard2.0|Article Wizard]].

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:V.O.N.|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:V.O.N.|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-band-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 18:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

== October 2009 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Welcome]] to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy deletion]] tag from {{#if:V.O.N. | [[:V.O.N.]],}} a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{[[Template:hangon|hangon]]}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's {{#if:V.O.N.|[[{{TALKPAGENAME:V.O.N.}}|talk page]]|talk page}}. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-speedy1 --> [[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

== Mark Sanford on 2012 Republican Primary Page? ==

I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012. Thanks. --[[User:David1982m|Diamond Dave]] ([[User talk:David1982m|talk]]) 22:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

== Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page ==

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--[[User:David1982m|Diamond Dave]] ([[User talk:David1982m|talk]]) 20:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

==Unreferenced BLPs==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] Hello Ai.kefu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a [[WP:BOT|bot]] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an[[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Sources| Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person]]. The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure [[WP:VERRIFY|verifiability]], all biographies should be based on [[WP:RELIABLE|reliable sources]]. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current ''[[:Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs|{{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}}]]'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

# [[James Pearson (actor)]] - <small>{{findsources|James Pearson (actor)}}</small>
Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 19:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
==GA reassessment of [[Condoleezza Rice]]==

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the [[WP:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps|GA Sweeps process]]. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at [[Talk:Condoleezza Rice/GA1]]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 23:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

== Comments invited ==

As an occasional or frequent editor of the [[Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012]] article, your participation in [[Talk:Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012#Proposal for new formatting of Speculated candidates section|this discussion]] would be welcome and appreciated. Thanks.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 18:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:21, 10 October 2010