User talk:PMDrive1061

Please note: Nothing here is ever lost and mistakes can be made. I've made more than my share. If I deleted a page of yours, please feel free to question the deletion. Odds are real good I'll put it back if it isn't nonsense or vandalism. Just be nice. Thanks.

Talkback

Hello, PMDrive1061. You have new messages at Neutralhomer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: New compooter!

Hello, PMDrive1061. You have new messages at Neutralhomer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

169.241.61.254

This user has been changing values and names in a wide range of files over the last few months. For example here. Slightsmile (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Shoe Goo for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Shoe Goo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoe Goo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sven Manguard _Talk 05:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Closing AFDs

I noticed from the last few of your AFD closes that you are having some trouble with the formatting. You might find this script useful. It lets you close them with one click of a button. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Shopping malls

This IP made this one joke, but I can't tell if his other edits over the past month about shopping malls in the Phillippines are valid or not. Slightsmile (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I've seen people getting issued these but never really understood how they work. I'll start acquainting myself with it now. Slightsmile (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

CSD

Dang your fast. I was just going to explain my removal of the copyright bot tag. But still good, Thanks. :) --Talktome^(Intelati) 05:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Intelati has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the midnight snack. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 05:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

4 For 4 tonight, with 3 deleted by you. File:Smily.png Thanks for your hard work. --Talktome^(Intelati) 05:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Complaint about deletion

44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Hello,

You deleted the page http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=La_Cumbre_Junior_High_School&action=edit&redlink=1

Please attach the deleted page to my account so I can work on it.

Also you didn't follow the proper procedures for deleting a page, I will overlook it this time but next time I will pursue the proper channels to see that you are in compliance when deleting pages.

This is the point that you missed when you deleted the page: "Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained." 44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

The earlier version also looks like copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 16:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

No the earlier version had one sentence, so no way it could have been G12. 44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please re-read the following:

G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement. Text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained. For equivocal cases (such as where there is a dubious assertion of permission, or where free-content edits overlie the infringement), please consult Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

Remember to check that the suspected source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror, and to notify the page's creator when tagging a page for deletion under this criterion; the template {{nothanks-sd}} is available for this. For images and media, see the equivalent criterion in the "Files" section below, which has more specific instructions.

44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

It looks like a copy of [1] and as copyvio, cannot be restored to your user space. Dougweller (talk) 16:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Every version I see is a clear three-paragraph cut/paste copyright violation. Acroterion _(talk) 17:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

• Well since I don't have access to any of it I can't say for sure but I thought there was a first version that just had one sentence. You don't see that version? I spent at least an hour just putting the basic page together without any alleged copyright violation, are you all saying that you will not restore that either? 44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
• This is the second article that you've "written" by just filching someone else's prose wholesale. No, you didn't put together any pages without copyright violations. Both articles were copies of someone else's writing from their very first revisions onwards. No, we won't assist you in violating other people's copyrights and passing off other people's non-free content as your own free content work. Write in your own words, please, or we will take your editing privileges away for the protection of the project. You have been warned about this with every edit page that you've ever seen here. Uncle G (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

• Well at least I have a clearer understanding of the stance on why this was deleted, but still I'm fairly certain there was an

initial copy of the page that contained no copyright violation. I think it's harsh and unpleasant and mean for you to delete the entire page. And obviously in this case it's a page about a school. It's not as if I am trying to plagiarize a novel. The information is public record. I also understand that there's a lot of abuse at wikipedia. But the road abuse runs both ways and I say that this is a case of abuse on the part of the deleter. And for this page I included a reference to the page. So how does one quote another page? Are quotes not allowed? 44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

• La Cumbre Junior High School only ever had one edit; the others are just "null edits" that resulted from the page move. Did you create a differently titled page on a different user account? —Soap— 18:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

• I never created it as another user, no. I did do a move when I noticed that the url was very long, it contained the county and state. Is it possible that one has the original version? We are talking about a school web page here and level heads did not

prevail when deciding to delete this. And threats from others doesn't help the cause of administrators. In fact it's immature and Uncle G should be put on warning for making threats. I may actually insist that some form of punishment be given to any administrator that threatens anyone on wikipedia. The street goes both ways here. Administrators ask for users to be polite and respectful and users are entitled to the exact same. Since Uncle G doesn't see it this way I think their admin privileges should be revoked or suspended. 44392e666b79c4673d6dcaf7cf774927 (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)