User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion

This page contains material which is kept because the contents are considered humorous. They are not intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Deletion debates
Deletion today Editors Articles (by category) Templates Images & media Categories (active) User categories Stub types Redirects Miscellany Deletion review
Deletion policy
Process - log - tools Guide - Admin guide

Editors for deletion (EfD), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.^[Verify]

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

Instruction creep

• You must not be listed here.
• The editor must not be listed here.
• The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
• You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page, the following must be met:

• You must not be listed here.
• You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
• Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.^[Who?]
• You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.

Criteria for editor deletion

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed. Do not nominate anyone unless you are reasonably sure they will accept the nomination. If you are nominating someone you do not know well, please avoid embarrassing yourself and ask them if they will accept the nomination before nominating them. Further, no editor may be nominated more than once.

Instructions

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Nominees

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor, even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Old discussions

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Current discussions

Mono

No indication of importance/significance. This is distinct from questions of notability, verifiability and reliability of sources. THENEWMONO 01:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

• Delete, block, and oversight as a sockpuppet of Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs). ~NerdyScienceDude 02:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Very strongly neutral Is TheNewMono like the New Coca Cola? I guess since I dont drink soda, it doesnt matter to me either way. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 03:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Delete Merge Userfy Neutral BJAODN Oppose Support Redirect List Comment. If you have the vote symblos script installed, please eat all the icons you see on the left. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Access Denied

Non-notable editor; only 11.5 million Google hits. I also am losing my mi-BUNNY!!!!!!!!!!&Ybdfb6ar359j43hj5wre5wh345jhw4wse4r Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 05:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A9. Blatantly made attacks on other editors' choice of footwear here, here and here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
• Eat with giant brick. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 10:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Grant Access. Doing so will remove this user and open his porn collection for me the greater good :-D Regards SoWhy 10:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep – 4 million hits on Google! As far as I know, access has already been granted... HeyMid (contributions) 19:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Swallow with giant ice cube - wipe that smile off your face. THENEWMONO 01:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• GARY COLEMAN per WP:FUCK. Dappl (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Fridae'sDoom

This nomination has been done in the public interest. Whilst there is a strong case for calender reform to create twelve equally sized months each having five weeks of six days, (plus a few days for celebrations and recovering from celebrations). Freya is a sufficiently powerful goddess that she should continue to have her own day. Which other goddess is honoured by having so many promises to complete things by her day or has so many celebrations on her day?So without prejudice as to which of the other six days should be deleted instead, I propose that Fridae be protected from it's doom, but welcome input from the community as to the appropriate termination method. ϢereSpielChequers 08:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I plead the fifth. This is day-ism, in this case it's Fridae-ism! I want a lawyer!!!! Ғяіᴅaз'§Đøøм | Spare your time? 22:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I am a lawyer. I'll be glad to help you upon receipt of my customary retainer fee. Newyorkbrad (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Fee? I ain't payin' no fee, you're all communists, communists I say! Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм | Champagne? 06:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete - this user no longer bears a shred of sanity :S, I propose that they be terminated quickly and quietly. Ғяіᴅaз'§Đøøм | Spare your time? 07:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

• Keep. We need the dynamic realtime updates to WP:100 :) --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
  • But this user is insane I tells ya!!! INSANE!!! —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 2:14pm • 03:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
• Regretful oppose I would request Checkusers to first confirm whether all the editors commenting here are socks of GlassCobra or not, including me (and especially Ron Ritzman, who has already been accused of being a sock of Glass Cobra here, here, and here). Kindly cut out the sock comments first and then speedily delete all the editors commenting here, including yourself if you comment here. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 09:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - The user just got account creator rights. I can't have him creating more accounts than I can in a day. The interface is not a race to create accounts, but it is a race of who can click the reserve case button first. --Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Weeeeerrrrrnnnnnstrooooom!!! —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 9:17pm • 10:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Cook, salt, and merge to Frydae'sDoom. Clementina talk 09:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • In Soviet Russia "Frydae'sDoom" cook, salt and merge you! —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 9:17pm • 10:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Stab with giant cheese slice. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 10:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Kayau

Non-notable user. Self-nom. Suggest WP:CSD. Kayau Voting IS evil 02:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

A long block.

• Keep. 52,000 Google hits prove notability without a shadow of doubt, and show that the nominator is on a deletionist crusade against themself. Also, the nomination statement is an egregious self attack worthy of a long block (pictured). Jafeluv (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
• Lego with a long block. Or maybe one of the thin bits that always get stuck on the other ones... GlassCobra 15:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
• Move to Encyclopedia Dramatica. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Protactinium-231 (now called 4)

Self nom. A non-notable radioisotope of an obscure element on the periodic table that doesn't have it's own article on Wikipedia and only has 13,600 Google hits anyway. Delete. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Supah delete! Nobody cares about science. — The Earwig @ 16:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

• According to a well known encyclopaedia "Due to its scarcity, high radioactivity, and high toxicity, there are currently no uses for protactinium outside of scientific research." So I'm not sure whether to conserve this editor due to scarcity or delete due to toxicity. However it is superconductive below 1.4k - so I suggest freeze in liquid Helium and use to make servers based on superconductor technology. ϢereSpielChequers 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Will die in about 32760 years anyway, so kill him earlier and it won't make any difference. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Not fair. I only have a few hours to live. ²³⁴₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ban him for wasting server resources and impersonating User:Wikipedia. WIKIPEDIA, the free encyclopedia.

You faked the time. The time is now...²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

You're wrong, the time is 06:35 ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No spoofing the MediaWiki interface. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow! That's amazing...time travel into the past! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 27 January 1756 (UTC)

Shut the fuck up. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

ARGH! No interwikis to Uncyclopedia. This is a clear violation of free speech. I WILL SUE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Block as per Wikipedia:No legal threats. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, world! You smell funny! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh my god! You insulted Jimbo! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to Unobtanium then declare a lost cause. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to macguffinite; using "unobtanium" on the big screen is just bad. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

• Ban per Wikipedia:No self attacks. bahamut0013^words_deeds 20:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete 4 is an unlucky number meaning "death" in Chinese the language of our future overlords. Don't give them ideas. Hekerui (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
• Delete because 4 is not, and never will be, Numberwang. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Ched Davis

Admin has come to my user page and :O OMG stolen mah commas[1], forcing me to protect them[2]. This is unacceptable behavior, and shows that he is probably a sock of Jimbo Wales. Therefore he must be deleted at once! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Strong Remove from Jimbo's Underpants as nom --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Uber strong keep - If he's deleted I'll have to edit Bill Buchanan all by mahself ^_^ Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Punish Steal his commas for punishment.--Giants27(c|s) 02:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Get the fuck out of my underpants - Oh shit I've been found out... *runs*... --Jimbo Wales // get in my pants // adopt a wale // 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete from Jimbo's underpants? - this could go in so many dark directions. Somebody save me! ... mah "boys" need room to breathe! — Ched :  ?  03:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

  You pervert! you have "boys" in Jimbo's Underpants????? Speedy Delete Ched Davis!!!! </witch hunt> --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete for keeping young boys prisoner in Jimbo's underpants. That's just sick man. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• NOOO .. not "boys" as in "young men" ... muh nads, stones, nuts, twins, as in brass balls. .. sigh .. I have gots to start choosing my words better. Oh forget it, I'm sunk - Coffee - I'll get you for this!  ;~| — Ched :  ?  22:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Reluctant delete per sock User has by and large been a useful and thoughtful editor, so this particular sockpuppetry allegation is a bit of a surprise. But we can't have one person with two accounts having admin status, so plz chz wch act gets to keep the bit. ϢereSpielChequers 09:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• there must be an error ... good socks don't make mistakes. — Jimbo :  ?  — Ched :  ?  22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Although not as a sock of Jimbo. Ched is clearly a sock of Roger Davies (talk · contribs), he just misspelled the name to deceive us! SoWhy 22:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Per JarlaxleArtemis. XD Pmlineditor ∞ 11:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete far too polite for his own good, which raises the bar for everyone else.--kelapstick (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete agree with kelapstick too much politness in one person can't nbe good.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Distract with shiny object and steal commas back. GlassCobra 19:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Copyvio of User:Pedro, and a sock of Jimbo. December21st2012Freak ^chat 21:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Whack with a fish, then we can all enjoy a tuna roll. bahamut0013^words_deeds 19:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I recommend eating a sausage roll instead. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Cheddar cheese. And what about Chad Davis?  Looks like a duck to me.  Chzz  ►  11:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was :

Floquenbeam

Recently passed in hell and with a remarkably calm approach. Refuses to reveal true identity, and thus I suspect this editor is actually a rogue adminbot. Suggest deletion and oversight of existence. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm all about transparency, so oppose oversight. Not sure how I feel yet about deletion, will consider carefully. On a procedural note, shouldn't you have at least waited until I placed myself in Category:Wikipedia administrators open to deletion? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Nope, you don't need either to be an admin or open to recall to be listed here. ϢereSpielChequers 22:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Overthrow. As a completely uninvolved observer, I have determined that there is indeed Wikipedia-wide consensus to rise up against the robot dictatorship and make Jafeluv the new Emperor and God-King. — Cafeluv // have a cup // 12:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

harej

Nominator's rationale: Destroy. This user and his robot army already control everything at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, Wikipedia:Requested moves, Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, with the stated intent to achieve more Lebensraum at the peaceful realm of category renames. Clearly this user is after total and utter dominance and Jimboship, and should be stopped at whatever cost. Upon deletion, I will assume control of the robot army as your new benevolent dictator. Jafeluv (talk) 11:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Clearly you haven't heard of my plans to conquer France! I propose we suppress Jafeluv as a political dissident conspiring against the glorious reich. @harej 15:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete but after doing so, give the robot army to SoWhy. I have heard great things about that guy and I am sure he would do much more good with it. ClearlyNotSoWhy 16:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
  • This guy seems legit. (I had concerns that this was a plot by SoWhy, but then I noticed the username which clearly states that this is an unrelated editor.) I will consider appointing SoWhy to the position of cleaning my boots once I become Emperor. Jafeluv (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
• Strong neutral. I can't be bothered to make up my mind.. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Even Stronger Neutral Because I can. ϢereSpielChequers 09:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

HLEP HERLP is this ok place to be asking question here? MY HOVERCRAFT IS FULL OF EELS helepe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chzz (talk • contribs) — Chzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Burn with fire And give the robot army to Hagger. Pmlineditor ∞ 09:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per "NO MOAR BOTS"! — Ched :  ?  03:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Execution by elephant. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Remember Skynet? Hekerui (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was No Dramaz. GlassCobra 15:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Huntster

As nom I bring this before the community. User:Huntster has shown a blatant disregard for drama, has continually attempted to improve the wiki, has often been kind and welcoming to new users, and has consistently attempted to disrupt daily procedures by actually resolving problems. This type of behavior simply can not be permitted! I propose that this user be deleted post haste. — Ched :  ?  05:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete we have no use for quality people here. — Ched :  ?  05:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as serving no real purpose. Clearly a sock of some better editor. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• I thought that Dumpster and Hamster were both useful articles in their own right. Would it be possible to de-merge them? ϢereSpielChequers 13:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and expand. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as every claim is unverifiable. Unless sources can be provided no point in keeping.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Draw and quarter, productive admins must be treated appropriately. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
• Subst and Delete - So we can use him on Trout, Boat, and Goldfish. Rowdy the Ant talk to Rowdy 22:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NETPOSITIVE. User seems to think that we're here to write an encyclopedia. Jafeluv (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
• De-1337, fails WP:NORULES  Chzz  ►  09:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Death by horrendous singing, looking particularly at GlassCobra and TPH (my singing, of course, is absolutely excellent , but it's canceled out). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

King of Hearts

I was going to speedy delete it under G7, but since other users have made highly constructive, substantial edits, I am bringing it here for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

• Make him a bureaucrat, oversighter, checkuser, arbitrator, ombudsman, Trustee, steward, and a Jimbo action figure - He's already the king of hearts, why not make him the king of all WMF? Or, we could do that by merging him with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Wikimedia Foundation. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 17:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• Promote to Ace of Hearts. --[midnight comet] [talk] 17:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not in the original. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Merge with Queen of Hearts, thus producing Prince of Hearts.^[3][4] More <3 is never a bad thing. Jafeluv (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, clear ATTACK of a subordinate, or transwiki and merge.  Chzz  ►  12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
• Put a skirt on him and make him the new mascot at Hearts. ϢereSpielChequers 15:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - the Queen of Hearts is always your best best. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 16:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete pfft .. trump their but ... Ace over king = delete — Ched :  ?  05:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Trump with Ace of Spades. "You know you're going to lose, cause gambling's for fools..." GlassCobra 16:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
• Cautious delete per G20. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy merge into Gambling. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Playin' with the queen of hearts / Knowin' it ain't really smart / Joker ain't the only fool / Who'd do anything for you Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.