User talk:216.100.93.234: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:37, 23 October 2010

June 2010

Your recent edit to the page A Hard Day's Night (album) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 16:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Radiopathy •talk• 20:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page James Naismith worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 16:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Moe Howard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to I'm Happy Just to Dance with You. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Band on the Run‎, you may be blocked from editing. Radiopathy •talk• 22:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Band on the Run, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinethicket (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Town (album)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on London Town (album). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Even though you're using two different IPs to edit, you are still bound by the 3RR policy. Radiopathy •talk• 02:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:25, 23 October 2010 edit Radiopathy (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 18,608 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:37, 23 October 2010 edit undo Daniel Case (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 224,998 edits blocked again Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring\|edit war]]''' according to the reverts you have made on [[:London Town (album)]]. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT\|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE\|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines\|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Even though you're using two different IPs to edit, you are still bound by the 3RR policy. <b>[[User:Radiopathy\|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy\|•talk•]] 02:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)		[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring\|edit war]]''' according to the reverts you have made on [[:London Town (album)]]. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT\|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE\|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines\|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Even though you're using two different IPs to edit, you are still bound by the 3RR policy. <b>[[User:Radiopathy\|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy\|•talk•]] 02:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg\|40px\|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring\|edit warring]]. During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines\|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[WP:CON\|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR\|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP\|page protection]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars\|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block\|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks\|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> [[User:Daniel Case\|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case\|talk]]) 03:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)