Jump to content

Talk:Arcadia 2001: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Arosio Stefano - "WP:OR and unreliable reference.: new section"
Line 31: Line 31:
produced the console and licenced it to other companies over the world with different names,
produced the console and licenced it to other companies over the world with different names,
different cartrige dimension but all of them software compatible. So we can't say that Arcadia 2001
different cartrige dimension but all of them software compatible. So we can't say that Arcadia 2001
is the origin of the family; it's only the most famous of it. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Arosio Stefano|Arosio Stefano]] ([[User talk:Arosio Stefano|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arosio Stefano|contribs]]) 21:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
is the origin of the family; it's only the most famous of it.

Revision as of 21:45, 23 October 2010

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

sprot? Dare I ask why?

I can't imagine that there exists a community of dedicated Arcadia 2001 vandals large enough to truly interfere with Wiki matters. Of course, I can't imagine that there exists a community of dedicated Arcadia 2001 users large or active enough to really require fresh, newly-registered updates. --Action Jackson IV 09:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...

Why is it semi-locked? just wondering... --72.87.32.148 20:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

public domain abandonware

I removed the statement that the games had been released into the public domain as abandonware. Abandonware isn't a real word and has no legal meaning. As for releasing something into public domain; there needs to be a proper citation to legally prove this to be true.

WP:OR and unreliable reference.

I have made this change and has been "undid" "per WP:OR and unreliable reference." I write under here what I wrote/find, so if more references are found and became common idea and no more a WP:OR, we can reintroduce the paragraph.

You can see that I have found another ref: http://amigan.1emu.net/digarch/2001-faq.htm#overview

What do you think?

   Some time ago all think that Emerson licensed the Arcadia 2001 worldwide,
   that all 30 software compatible console was clone of Arcadia.
   Today 
   ref: http://amigan.1emu.net/digarch/2001-faq.htm#overview         (new ref! not present in my first writing!)
   ref: http://mess.redump.net/sysinfo:arcadia 
   ref: http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?st=2&c=835
   we can say that the manufacturer of the chipset 2650/2637, Philips-Signetics, 
   produced the console and licenced it to other companies over the world with different names, 
   different cartrige dimension but all of them software compatible. So we can't say that Arcadia 2001 
   is the origin of the family; it's only the most famous of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arosio Stefano (talkcontribs) 21:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]