Jump to content

User talk:188.23.184.50: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 188.23.184.50 (talk) to last version by Daniel Case
do not revert unblock declines
Line 3: Line 3:


please open this questionable and unfair rangeblock thanks
please open this questionable and unfair rangeblock thanks

Please do not revert the decline of an unblock as vandalism (that is itself vandalism). If you do it again, I will protect this page. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:40, 24 October 2010

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

188.23.184.50 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

Only edit from IP is this request. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
188.23.184.50 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: Not autoblocked — Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please open this questionable and unfair rangeblock thanks

Please do not revert the decline of an unblock as vandalism (that is itself vandalism). If you do it again, I will protect this page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]