Talk:Halo Array: Difference between revisions
Masterzora (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Found enough official evidence: http://halosm.bungie.org/story/halo2_level_transcripts/lv01_heretic.html |
Found enough official evidence: http://halosm.bungie.org/story/halo2_level_transcripts/lv01_heretic.html |
||
[[User:Masterzora|Masterzora]] 19:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC) |
[[User:Masterzora|Masterzora]] 19:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
This article says both that the radius and diameter of the halos are 10,000 km, which is obviously not possible, as the radius is half of the diameter. Could someone clarify which of these it is? |
|||
[[User:71.209.204.139|71.209.204.139]] 02:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:32, 12 February 2006
Why is installation 04 called "Alpha Halo" if installation 05 is "Delta Halo"? That makes no sense. Also, isn't it a little unwise to extrapolate a whole naming convention from one or two examples? It seems unlikely that the monitor of installation 06 would be 16807, it would be too cumbersome to pronounce in the cinematics ;) Sippan 08:10, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Ummm.. I don't care if it makes sense, but it is officially Alpha Halo and Delta Halo. Unfortunately, I don't remember where exactly it is stated, but I think it is probably in one of the books. I wish I had a more concrete basis for this, but I promise that it is true. Is there anyone who can back this up for me? --Masterzora 09:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Found enough official evidence: http://halosm.bungie.org/story/halo2_level_transcripts/lv01_heretic.html Masterzora 19:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
This article says both that the radius and diameter of the halos are 10,000 km, which is obviously not possible, as the radius is half of the diameter. Could someone clarify which of these it is? 71.209.204.139 02:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC)