Talk:Arthur Alan Wolk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:33, 3 November 2010

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted on 18 October 2010 by reviewer Waterfox (talk · contribs).

I disagree with the edit that removed all discussion of Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson. This is a notable case that has been covered by many publications and is of a lot of importance to the Internet (including Wikipedia).[1] I have cited only notable ones, Reason (magazine), The Legal Intelligencer, and Philadelphia Business Journal.[2][3][4]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WPAFC|ts=20101018224151|reviewer=Waterfox|class=start}}
+== [[Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson]] ==
+I disagree with the edit that removed all discussion of [[Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson]].  This is a notable case that has been covered by many publications and is of a lot of importance to the Internet (including Wikipedia).[http://www.google.com/search?q=arthur+wolk+libel+lawsuit+-site:wikipedia.org]  I have cited only notable ones, [[Reason (magazine)]], [[The Legal Intelligencer]], and [[Philadelphia Business Journal]].[http://reason.com/blog/2010/08/06/lawyer-trying-to-protect-his-r][http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202464319845][http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/blogs/law/2010/08/overlawyered_blog_case_testing_statute_of_limitations_for_defamation.html]