Jump to content

User talk:Winterus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add prodwarning
Prod - Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles; you can help!
Line 76: Line 76:


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 16:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 16:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Ibanez PM120]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]

The article [[Ibanez PM120]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''A search for references found only a single published (gBooks) mention of the subject, fails [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Ibanez PM120|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:JeepdaySock|JeepdaySock]] <small>(AKA, [[User talk:Jeepday|Jeepday]])</small> 11:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:44, 9 November 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Winterus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Peloponnesian War as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Peloponnesian War was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 12:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Wall Street Crash of 1929 as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Wall Street Crash of 1929 was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Featured Sounds

The software isn't primarly made to remove clipping, it just has the additional capacity. It's the FL virtual studio. However, I don't seem to get a buzzing sound when I download it... maybe you mean distorted high or low notes?--Orthologist 22:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

automatic red dot in the map ([1])

Please discuss first here. -- Homer Landskirty 16:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Sahlin

It would be nice if you add an explanation to why you reverted my edit on Mona Sahlin. Please join Talk:Mona Sahlin. --Kildor (talk) 18:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GD2

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Great Depression. If you create a properly referenced new article in your user space and take it to DRV, you might get a sympathetic response. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work [2]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nizar Rayan

Updated DYK query On January 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nizar Rayan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist images

You think the images are OK. Yet they really do not add anything to the content, I do not see the point of including pictures of Jesus, the WTC and the Fed simply because the text mentions them, to me this practice would appear to be more apt in a book for kids or an ad. Besides, the caption in the Fed picture is not a main point in the movie, if mentioned at all.Sardath (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lars Kepler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tim Song (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lars Kepler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

An anonymous person cannot be specifically notable {{Notability}}, whereas it may be that the book is notable, and the author may be mentioned in that regard. -- billinghurst (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ibanez GB-10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006 stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ibanez PM120 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only a single published (gBooks) mention of the subject, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]