Jump to content

User talk:Saudiartexpert: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Eskimo.the (talk | contribs)
AfD nomination of BMB Group. (TW)
Nomination of BMB Group for deletion: comments added...is tis still up for deletion?
Line 49: Line 49:


You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Eskimo.the|The Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo.the|talk]]) 16:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Eskimo.the|The Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo.the|talk]]) 16:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


It appears many have edited this to bring inline with Wiki regulation policies. It looks much better. [[User:Saudiartexpert|Saudiartexpert]] ([[User talk:Saudiartexpert#top|talk]]) 15:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:03, 11 November 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Saudiartexpert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BMB GROUP LIMITED, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Old notices

The article BMB GROUP LIMITED has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to be a cut & paste duplicate of Rayo Salahadin Withanage and so is a pointless WP:CFORK of the same.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BMB Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to add footnotes

Footnotes can be added inline to the body of your text using <ref> tags. An example looks like:

JavaScript is used on webpages today.<ref>Smith, John (2005), ''JavaScript 101'', ISBN 938223445333</ref>

And the resultant text would look like: JavaScript is used on webpages today.1

With the superscript 1 being a link to a footnote at the bottom of the page automatically created by inserting the code: {{reflist}}

An easy to follow standard guide is at WP:Referencing for beginners with citation templates and a primer for general editing is at WP:How to edit a page (concise). Thanks, (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BMB Group for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article BMB Group, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMB Group until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Eskimo (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


It appears many have edited this to bring inline with Wiki regulation policies. It looks much better. Saudiartexpert (talk) 15:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]