K2K experiment: Difference between revisions
|author=<!--No need for them--> |
ce |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |
|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |
||
|pmid=16971911 |
|pmid=16971911 |
||
|volume=443 |
|volume=443 |issue=7108 |pages=126 |
||
|issue=7108 |pages=126 |
|||
|doi=10.1038/443126a |
|doi=10.1038/443126a |
||
}}</ref> Previous experiments relied on neutrinos [[Neutrino#Solar neutrinos|from the Sun]] or from [[cosmic ray|cosmic sources]]. The experiment found oscillation parameters which were consistent with those measured by Super-Kamiokande. |
}}</ref> Previous experiments relied on neutrinos [[Neutrino#Solar neutrinos|from the Sun]] or from [[cosmic ray|cosmic sources]]. The experiment found oscillation parameters which were consistent with those measured by Super-Kamiokande. |
||
Line 112: | Line 111: | ||
}} and erratum {{cite journal |
}} and erratum {{cite journal |
||
|author=<!--No need for them--> |
|author=<!--No need for them--> |
||
⚫ | |||
|title=Erratum: Measurements of the Solar Neutrino Flux from Super-Kamiokande's First 300 Days [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1158 (1998)] |
|||
|title=<!--No need for it--> |
|||
|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |
|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |
||
|volume=81 |pages=4279 |
|volume=81 |pages=4279 |
||
⚫ | |||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4279 |
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4279 |
||
}}</ref> and the later [[MINOS]] result.<ref> |
}}</ref> and the later [[MINOS]] result.<ref> |
Revision as of 05:39, 12 November 2010
The K2K experiment (KEK to Kamioka) was a neutrino experiment that ran from June 1999 to November 2004. It used muon neutrinos from a well-controlled and well-understood beam to verify the oscillations previously observed by Super-Kamiokande using atmospheric neutrinos. This was the first positive measurement of neutrino oscillations in which both the source and detector were fully under experimenters' control.[1][2] Previous experiments relied on neutrinos from the Sun or from cosmic sources. The experiment found oscillation parameters which were consistent with those measured by Super-Kamiokande.
Experimental design
K2K is a neutrino experiment which directed a beam of muon neutrinos (
ν
μ) from the 12 GeV proton synchrotron at the KEK, located in Tsukuba, Ibaraki, to the Kamioka Observatory, located in Kamioka, Gifu, about 250 km away.[3] The muon neutrinos travelled through Earth, which allowed them to oscillate (change) into other flavours of neutrinos, namely into electron neutrinos (
ν
e) and tauon neutrinos (
ν
τ). K2K however, focused only on
ν
μ →
ν
τ oscillations.[4]
The proton beam from the synchrotron was directed onto an aluminium target, and the resulting collisions produced a copious amount of pions. These pions were then focused into a 200 m decay pipe, where they would decay into muons and muon neutrinos.[3] The muons were stopped at the end of the pipe, leaving a beam of muon neutrinos. The exact composition of the beam contained over 97% muon neutrinos, with the other 3% being made of electron neutrinos (
ν
e), electron antineutrinos (
ν
e) and muon antineutrinos (
ν
μ).[4]
After they exited the pipe, the neutrinos went through a 1-kiloton water Cherenkov neutrino detector ("near detector") located at about 300 m from the aluminium target to determine the neutrino beam characteristics. This 1-kiloton "near detector" was a scaled-down version of the 50-kiloton Super-Kamiokande "far detector" located at the Kamioka Observatory, which allowed scientists to eliminate certain systematic uncertainties that would be present if two different detector types were used.[5] This dual-detector configuration allowed the comparison of the neutrino beam at the near detector with the neutrino beam at the far detector to determine if neutrinos had oscillated or not.[6]
Collaboration
The K2K collaboration consisted of roughly 130 physicists from 27 universities and research institutes from all over the world, listed below.[7] The full list of scientists and their countries of origin is available on the K2K website.
Results
The final K2K results found that at 99.9985% confidence (4.3 σ) there had been a disappearance of muon neutrinos. Fitting the data under the oscillation hypothesis, the best fit for the square of the mass difference between muon neutrinos and tauon neutrinos was (Δm)2 = 2.8×10−3 eV2.[4] This result is in good agreement with the previous Super-Kamiokande result,[8] and the later MINOS result.[9]
See also
- T2K experiment – the successor of the K2K experiment
References
- ^ "Synthetic neutrinos appear to disappear". CERN Courier. 40 (7). 18 August 2000.
- ^ N. Nosengo (2006). "Neutrinos make a splash in Italy". Nature. 443 (7108): 126. doi:10.1038/443126a. PMID 16971911.
- ^ a b "Long Baseline neutrino oscillation experiment, from KEK to Kamioka (K2K)". High Energy Accelerator Research Organization. 13 June 2002. Retrieved 2010-09-03.
- ^ a b c
M. H. Ahn et al. (K2K Collaboration) (2006). "Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation by the K2K Experiment". Physical Review D. 74: 072003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.072003. arXiv:hep-ex/0606032.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^
"K2K: Near Detector". Stony Brook Super-Kamiokande/K2K group. 19 June 1999. Retrieved 2010-09-03.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^
"K2K: Introduction". Stony Brook Super-Kamiokande/K2K group. 20 June 1999. Retrieved 2010-09-03.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ "K2K Member Institutes". High Energy Accelerator Research Organization. 20 January 2004. Retrieved 2010-09-03.
- ^
Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-K Collaboration) (1998). "Measurements of the Solar Neutrino Flux from Super-Kamiokande's First 300 Days". Physical Review Letters. 81: 1158. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1158. and erratum Physical Review Letters. 81: 4279. 1998. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4279.
{{cite journal}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ D.G. Michael et al. (MINOS Collaboration) (2006). "Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors in the NuMI neutrino beam". Physical Review Letters. 97: 191801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.191801. arXiv:hep-ex/0607088.