Talk:Aastha Chaudhary: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:24, 13 November 2010

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aastha Chaudhary article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by 70.21.16.94 (talk · contribs) on 12 November 2010 with the comment:
Subject lacks reliable sources to satisfy WP:ENTERTAINER critera … mostly self-published sources provided.
It was contested by UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk · contribs) on 2010-11-13

Citation of references in the page Aastha Chaudhary

I have cited various sources, which are not self written by me or relating to me. One link is of Indya.com, which is an official website of STAR TV (Asia). If thats not sufficient for you, what can I do. What about doing a search on any search engine about this celebrity. If you are not convinced then also, if i provide the link of the official website of a TV network, then I can't help. I am removing the message from the top of the article with immediate effect. Thanks, UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 05:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indya.com, besides not being notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article, is not considered a reliable source, just as IMDb is not considered a WP:RS … WP:SPS refers to the kinds of sites where the subject is allowed to enter information about themselves, such as message boards or blogs. What's needed is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (to quote WP:GNG) … that means articles in reputable newspapers or magazines, like Hindustan Times. In any event, the fate of this article now lies in the hands of community consensus, but unless you or Some Other Editor can find some "significant coverage" in the next week, it will be deleted. — 70.21.16.94 (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is another unreliable source … please see Links normally to be avoided item #10. — 70.21.16.94 (talk) 06:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 == Citation of references in the page Aastha Chaudhary ==
 I have cited various sources, which are not self written by me or relating to me. One link is of Indya.com, which is an official website of [[STAR TV (Asia)]]. If thats not sufficient for you, what can I do. What about doing a search on any search engine about this celebrity. If you are not convinced then also, if i provide the link of the official website of a TV network, then I can't help. I am removing the message from the top of the article with immediate effect. Thanks, [[User:UnbeatableIndia2020|UnbeatableIndia2020]] ([[User talk:UnbeatableIndia2020|talk]]) 05:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
-:Indya.com, besides not being [[WP:N|notable]] enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article, is not considered a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], just as [[IMDb]] is not considered a [[WP:RS]] … [[WP:SPS]] refers to the kinds of sites where the ''subject'' is allowed to enter information about themselves, such as message boards or blogs. What's needed is "significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject" (to quote [[WP:GNG]] … that means articles in reputable newspapers or magazines, like ''[[Hindustan Times]]''. In any event, the fate of this article now lies in the hands of community [[WP:consensus|consensus]], but unless you or Some Other Editor can find some "significant coverage" in the next week, it will be deleted. &mdash; [[Special:Contributions/70.21.16.94|70.21.16.94]] ([[User talk:70.21.16.94|talk]]) 06:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
+:Indya.com, besides not being [[WP:N|notable]] enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article, is not considered a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], just as [[IMDb]] is not considered a [[WP:RS]] … [[WP:SPS]] refers to the kinds of sites where the ''subject'' is allowed to enter information about themselves, such as message boards or blogs. What's needed is "significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject" (to quote [[WP:GNG]]) … that means articles in reputable newspapers or magazines, like ''[[Hindustan Times]]''. In any event, the fate of this article now lies in the hands of community [[WP:consensus|consensus]], but unless you or Some Other Editor can find some "significant coverage" in the next week, it will be deleted. &mdash; [[Special:Contributions/70.21.16.94|70.21.16.94]] ([[User talk:70.21.16.94|talk]]) 06:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 ::[[Facebook]] is another unreliable source … please see [[WP:ELNO|Links normally to be avoided]] item #10. &mdash; [[Special:Contributions/70.21.16.94|70.21.16.94]] ([[User talk:70.21.16.94|talk]]) 06:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)