Jump to content

Talk:Civilization IV: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Xenobot Mk V (talk | contribs)
m Bot) Tagging for WP:MAC: inherit class from other projects, (Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Macintosh}}
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
Would it be correct to assume he's [[Emperor Taizong of Tang]]? [[User:Kanjo Kotr|Kanjo Kotr]] ([[User talk:Kanjo Kotr|talk]]) 13:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Would it be correct to assume he's [[Emperor Taizong of Tang]]? [[User:Kanjo Kotr|Kanjo Kotr]] ([[User talk:Kanjo Kotr|talk]]) 13:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
:Best not to make assumptions. If someone has the Chinese manual, perhaps they can verify. Or this leader could be removed from the list, as this is the English Wikipedia, not the Chinese one, and we don't need to know about that version of the game. [[User:Dp76764|<font color="#FF0000">DP</font><font color="#0000FF">76764</font>]] ([[User Talk:Dp76764|Talk]]) 16:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
:Best not to make assumptions. If someone has the Chinese manual, perhaps they can verify. Or this leader could be removed from the list, as this is the English Wikipedia, not the Chinese one, and we don't need to know about that version of the game. [[User:Dp76764|<font color="#FF0000">DP</font><font color="#0000FF">76764</font>]] ([[User Talk:Dp76764|Talk]]) 16:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

== More Info on Great People ==
I was thinking that perhaps there should be more detailed info on the great people. Not necessarily a list, but perhaps an organizational chart that is done similiar to the civilizations with leaders, units, etc. My reasoning is that Great People are a huge part of the game and contribute to the educational value of the game. Who hasn't googled or wp'd some of the great people to learn more about them? Anyway, if they were listed here with links to their WP page, it could be valuable to the educational merit of WP, which in the end is learning and the sharing of knowledge. [[User:Hobbamock|Hobbamock]] ([[User talk:Hobbamock|talk]]) 03:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:43, 18 November 2010

WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconApple Inc. C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

More Info???

I would like to see more information on civ 4, like the resources. Not to much for 'wikipedia is not a game guide' to show up, though. Articleer (talk) 01:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For more information you might want to visit the Civilization IV Wiki at Wikia. The articles about the resources haven't been created yet, though, but the wiki still has almost 500 articles. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 12:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, the Civilization IV Wiki now holds more than 700 articles, including articles about the resources. I think adding a link to the Civ4 wiki should be considered. To the External links section of this article, I mean. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 21:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pulled the stability problems section

Unreferenced for a few months now. Pulled it out for now. DP76764 (Talk) 04:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename/move article

I suggest moving the article to Sid Meier's Civilization IV since that is the game's full title. SharkD (talk) 01:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I say leave it as it is, it's far more commonly known as just Civilization IV. Properly a case of WP:NC(CN). QueenCake (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
More discussion has occured here. SharkD (talk) 01:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editions Comparison

I had to do some digging but I found what the differences are between the Special, Gold, and Complete editions. Special as someone mentioned includes a faux leather box, soundtrack, Tech Tree poster, and keyboard template. Gold includes the Warlords expansion, a Behind-the-scenes DVD, a Fantasy and aTech Tree poster. Complete includes the two expansions on a single DVD disc. Most information from mobygames.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.195.42.217 (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rhye.civfanatics.net

I recently removed links to this site added by the site-owner

Since this issue spans Wikipedias in multiple languages, there's a discussion underway on Meta-Wiki with the owner of this site at the bottom of this page:

Given the history discussed there, neither the site-owner, IPs nor new user accounts should add these links or write about these mods in article space since it's against our Conflict of Interest Guideline). If established editors wish to add neutral material about the owner or his products, that's OK. Any material should cite references that meet the requirements of our No Original Research, Reliable Sources and Verifiability standards.

It's also OK for the owner to discuss suggested changes on article talk pages, as long as he/she isn't just nagging for inclusion (see WP:CANVASS).

If you want to comment on this post, it would probably be best to leave any remarks at the link above, not here, since this discussion spans multiple articles. I think that if you're already signed in on this Wikipedia, leaving a post there will automatically set up an account there for you there but I'm not sure -- you might want to make a sandbox edit there first to be sure. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 12:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be correct to assume he's Emperor Taizong of Tang? Kanjo Kotr (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Best not to make assumptions. If someone has the Chinese manual, perhaps they can verify. Or this leader could be removed from the list, as this is the English Wikipedia, not the Chinese one, and we don't need to know about that version of the game. DP76764 (Talk) 16:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More Info on Great People

I was thinking that perhaps there should be more detailed info on the great people. Not necessarily a list, but perhaps an organizational chart that is done similiar to the civilizations with leaders, units, etc. My reasoning is that Great People are a huge part of the game and contribute to the educational value of the game. Who hasn't googled or wp'd some of the great people to learn more about them? Anyway, if they were listed here with links to their WP page, it could be valuable to the educational merit of WP, which in the end is learning and the sharing of knowledge. Hobbamock (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]