Jump to content

User talk:Wikidemon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hemanetwork (talk | contribs)
Line 55: Line 55:


You asked me to get a hold of you if there were issues with my article; if you have a chance to look at it, it seems to have gotten quite a bit out of date, especially since the majority of my RS press coverage has been in the last fifteen months, and it doesn't reflect my current job. (It's a bit embarrassing to be introduced as a speaker and have to correct the person who introduced me because they relied on an inaccurate Wikipedia article.) The CCAF article could also use updating. A handy-dandy index of recent sources [http://tedfrank.com/press can be found here]. Thanks. [[User:THF|THF]] ([[User talk:THF|talk]]) 20:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
You asked me to get a hold of you if there were issues with my article; if you have a chance to look at it, it seems to have gotten quite a bit out of date, especially since the majority of my RS press coverage has been in the last fifteen months, and it doesn't reflect my current job. (It's a bit embarrassing to be introduced as a speaker and have to correct the person who introduced me because they relied on an inaccurate Wikipedia article.) The CCAF article could also use updating. A handy-dandy index of recent sources [http://tedfrank.com/press can be found here]. Thanks. [[User:THF|THF]] ([[User talk:THF|talk]]) 20:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

== hookups and dudesnude ==

I am not trying to add content that isn't true or supported, for example see [[craigslist]] and [[manhunt.net]] i have added a lot more sources, also you seem to know a lot here. how can i find more sources for [[dudesnude]] or do i have enough at this point?[[User:Hemanetwork|Hemanetwork]] ([[User talk:Hemanetwork|talk]]) 01:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:43, 25 November 2010

Discussion invitation

British Royalty Hi Wikidemon, I would like to invite you and anyone watching who shares an interest in moving forward constructively to a discussion about Biographies of Living People

New editors' lack of understanding of Wikipedia processes has resulted in thousands of BLPs being created over the last few years that do not meet BLP requirements. We are currently seeking constructive proposals on how to help newcomers better understand what is expected, and how to improve some 48,000 articles about living people as created by those 17,500 editors, through our proper cleanup, expansion, and sourcing.

These constructive proposals might then be considered by the community as a whole at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people.

Please help us:

Proposal

Hello, Wikidemon. You have new messages at Talk:List of Jewish actors.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Foreign-language references for BLPs

I've explained my edit to the policy at Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#Non-English_sources_and_BLP_.28foreign_language_sources.29. Perhaps you could devise a better method of avoiding sources which cannot actually be verified without considerable difficulty. Peter Karlsen (talk) 07:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gamification for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Gamification, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamification until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthonzi (talk) 11:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the canned message; first time using twinkle (I will definitely write notifications by hand in the future). But I am concerned that Gamification and Funware are neologisms that aren't sufficiently established words.--Anthonzi (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification

This is just to point out that I've responded to your point about recusals on the requests for clarification page. I also appreciated your contribution on the merits of the issue. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much. I think I'll move my recusal question to the talk page, as that's a meta issue. Best, - Wikidemon (talk) 18:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you do, please feel free to move my response as well. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Wow, that was fast. Well...maybe best to leave it in place. - Wikidemon (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

updating a couple of articles

You asked me to get a hold of you if there were issues with my article; if you have a chance to look at it, it seems to have gotten quite a bit out of date, especially since the majority of my RS press coverage has been in the last fifteen months, and it doesn't reflect my current job. (It's a bit embarrassing to be introduced as a speaker and have to correct the person who introduced me because they relied on an inaccurate Wikipedia article.) The CCAF article could also use updating. A handy-dandy index of recent sources can be found here. Thanks. THF (talk) 20:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hookups and dudesnude

I am not trying to add content that isn't true or supported, for example see craigslist and manhunt.net i have added a lot more sources, also you seem to know a lot here. how can i find more sources for dudesnude or do i have enough at this point?Hemanetwork (talk) 01:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]