Talk:MXML: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:09, 30 November 2010

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Do you have to have a Flex license to use MXML or MXMLC (the command line AS3/MXML compiler)?

No, you don't. The Flex SDK is free, and includes the MXMLC compiler which can compile an MXML source file into a Flash (.swf) file. 24.5.179.225 07:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"'drill-down' through an object". Is "drill down" a standard expression ? I haven't seen it before. How about replacing it by "accessing the object properties/fields" ? Fabricebaro (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "drill down" is standard terminology, and no, "accessing the object properties/fields" does NOT mean the same thing. Drilling down through an object implies going through many layers of links/pointers/references/subobjects, whatever they're called, eventually accessing the actual properties/fields/data at the end of the chain of dereferencing. 76.243.129.217 (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your experiance about working in events by using flex mxml code

Hi guys, just share your experiences about working with events by using flex mxml code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohanmacmilton (talk • contribs) 08:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Code example removed

Why has the extended code example been removed? For me, it was always helpful as a quick reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.24.201.180 (talk) 15:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? The code example is present and intact. Fleet Command (talk) 16:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:22, 30 November 2010 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,509 edits m Signing comment by 217.24.201.180 - "→Code example removed: new section" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:09, 30 November 2010 edit undo FleetCommand (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 20,812 edits →Code example removed: The code example is intact. Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Why has the extended code example been removed? For me, it was always helpful as a quick reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.24.201.180\|217.24.201.180]] ([[User talk:217.24.201.180\|talk]]) 15:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Why has the extended code example been removed? For me, it was always helpful as a quick reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.24.201.180\|217.24.201.180]] ([[User talk:217.24.201.180\|talk]]) 15:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			:What are you talking about? The code example is present and intact. [[User:FleetCommand\|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand\|talk]]) 16:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)