Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions
blocked |
CU results |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*{{Endorse}} - Been a few months. Could just use a CU to confirm the name change, and maybe also see if there are sleepers. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 03:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
*{{Endorse}} - Been a few months. Could just use a CU to confirm the name change, and maybe also see if there are sleepers. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 03:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*Blocked by {{admin|Bsadowski1}} [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 03:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
*Blocked by {{admin|Bsadowski1}} [[User:Nakon|<font color="#C50">'''Nakon'''</font>]] 03:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
No other sleepers. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 04:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 04:01, 3 December 2010
TungstenCarbide
TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
03 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- WC XXXIII (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
The name matches the prior pattern (WC = the chemical formula for Tungsten (W) Carbide (C), prior "TungstenCarbide XXII" etc name+roman numeral acounts); and a somewhat mild-mannered initial approach to administrative discussions is TungstenCarbide's MO... This could be an innocent collision, but I suspect not. This edit [1] to Tungsten carbide, other topics approached... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - Been a few months. Could just use a CU to confirm the name change, and maybe also see if there are sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)- Blocked by Bsadowski1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Nakon 03:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
No other sleepers. –MuZemike 04:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)