Talk:Kannadigas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:13, 3 December 2010

India: Karnataka B‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as High-importance).

Archives

Archive-1

Neutrality

This article is way out of control.Pls add relevant sections and follow wikipedia policy...Pls visit the Tamil people page and see how a good ethnic article must be developed...And pls use neutral point of view....Thanks.... ARUNKUMAR P.R^Talk 11:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True this article is a mess remove all unreferenced povs (OR)--NotedGrant Talk 14:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed irrelevant and POV section.Still the article needs to be structured like the Tamil people article which is a featured article.

ARUNKUMAR P.R^Talk 09:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am really surprised to read Wikipedia about Kannadiga section. I don't know why Kannadigas are always comparing or treating Tamil language/Tamilians in a harsh way. Afterall Tamil,Telugu,Tulu,Malayalam and Kannada are dravidian languages. We are in a single group. Dravidian language is a single language. The amount of influence of Sanskrit gave out new names such as Telugu, Tulu, Malayalam, Kannada ..etc. If for some reason Kannadigas accept that Kannada is a bye-product of Sanskrit then all Kannadigas must be Aryans? But the problem is we should also accept Mandya/Hassan Gowdas as Aryans? Will the world agree? Please do not compare Tamil with Kannada at any point of time? I would also like add one more thing? Cholas were great tamil kings, but during their time only tamil literacy level was too low; no new works were done. It is history. you cannot change it. Every one is envying tamilnadu because in all the fields/offices, you can only see black people. Backward community development is much more here in Tamilnadu. It has liberated from British with India and liberated from Brahminsm with EVR who is a Kannadiga. Todays Tamilnadu is made by EVR though he never ruled Tamilnadu like MK.Gandhi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.110.2 (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MR can you tell us how Mandya/Hassan Gowdas for Aryans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.172.167.129 (talk) 11:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Mallya

Kindly see the Goud Saraswat Brahmin page of Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.52.53.206 (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

do not write anything againt Tamils. This is not a forum to vent your anger and personal attacks

dinesh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshpkm (talk • contribs) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Kannadiga

There are few non-kannadigas included the list of Kannidigas. Some even featured in the info box with pics, like Nanadan Nelkini, Deepika Padukone etc. Please remove those names from the list.188.49.24.149 (talk) 08:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 dinesh  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dineshpkm|Dineshpkm]] ([[User talk:Dineshpkm|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dineshpkm|contribs]]) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==Non Kannadiga==
+There are few non-kannadigas included the list of Kannidigas. Some even featured in the info box with pics, like Nanadan Nelkini, Deepika Padukone etc. Please remove those names from the list.[[Special:Contributions/188.49.24.149|188.49.24.149]] ([[User talk:188.49.24.149|talk]]) 08:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)