User talk:Mike Church~enwiki: Difference between revisions
m link fix |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
You have been [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=1999&diff=prev&oldid=39981790 this] edit and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=June_12&diff=prev&oldid=39981883 this] edit. [[Douchebag|kmccoy]] [[Talk:Douche|(talk)]] 00:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC) |
You have been [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=1999&diff=prev&oldid=39981790 this] edit and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=June_12&diff=prev&oldid=39981883 this] edit. [[Douchebag|kmccoy]] [[Talk:Douche|(talk)]] 00:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I apologize for the way you were born, but it |
:I apologize for the way you were born, but it isn't my fault. [[User:Mike Church|Mike Church]] 05:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Brian Peppers link in [[Time travel]] == |
== Brian Peppers link in [[Time travel]] == |
Revision as of 05:36, 18 February 2006
You have been blocked from editing for 72 hours because of this edit and this edit. kmccoy (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- The first, maybe, deserved 24: perhaps it wasn't the best judgment (but it was funny). The second, no. You're a fucking moron and a douchebag. With contempt, Mike Church 21:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Your message on Kmccoy's talk page
I'm not sure that I agree with a 72hour block over the two cited edits, although I don't know the history. I do know that the intensity of your attack on Kmccoy was completely out of line although, from reading your talk page history, it seems consistent with your past behavior. In my view your reaction signified a failure to pass a TrialByExile. If you want any hope of being permitted to continue on this site, you should be more careful with your language. --Gmaxwell 11:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm on a strict low-idiocy diet which means that I barely have enough room in my allowance to suffer my own. Therefore, I tend to be somewhat intolerant of stupidity in other people, at least when their poor judgment affects me (when it doesn't, I can ignore it).
- Kmccoy showed terrible judgment, bad enough to call into severe doubt his capacity as moderator, and since this entailed a 72-hour block, it affected me. Therefore, my natural aversion to idiocy arose. I actually think my "language" was a lot nicer than it could have been; I made an effort, on his talk page, to abstain from profanity and personal attacks. I merely stated bluntly that I do not think much of his moderating capacity. Mike Church 22:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
The "Anubis" game
How about you create an article on the game "Anubis"?
- I don't know anything about it. Mike Church 23:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Improper edit
Edits such as this are inappropriate and will result in your being blocked if they continue. kmccoy (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize, O exalted one. I salute you and the state. Mike Church 01:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for this edit and this edit. kmccoy (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize for the way you were born, but it isn't my fault. Mike Church 05:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Brian Peppers link in Time travel
It would seem that the addition of the link to Brian Peppers to the article Time travel is a controversial one. For myself, I don't see the relevance, but am open to discuss the matter. As such, I have begun a discussion on the talk page of the article. Rather than the reversion back and forth, if you can explain the relevance there perhaps we can come to some kind of consensus. Many thanks, --Hansnesse 06:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- The BP meme invokes time travel often. It came from the original association of him with the prehistoric song (Burn Bogonga) from Chrono Trigger. Hence, Brian Peppers is associated with time travel. Mike Church 06:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick reply! In the interest of gathering more comments, I have replied on Talk:Time_travel#Brian_Peppers, and posted a link to your reply above. By all means, feel free to comment further on the talk page. Thanks again, --Hansnesse 07:02, 17 February 2006 (UTC)