Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erol Zavar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Courcelles (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
delete, sorry |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 03:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 03:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
:*'''Delete''' Awful to say, but a non-notable case of injustice with no coverage outside of advocacy group. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 17:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:26, 14 December 2010
- Erol Zavar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be only the subject of coverage by advocacy groups for his release, has long been unreferenced and page view statistics suggest he may have been the product of momentary celebrity with no long term relevance Sadads (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)- Delete Awful to say, but a non-notable case of injustice with no coverage outside of advocacy group. EEng (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)