Talk:The Nutcracker in 3D: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 75.200.3.233 - "→Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs: new section" |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs == |
== Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs == |
||
Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com. |
Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.200.3.233|75.200.3.233]] ([[User talk:75.200.3.233|talk]]) 08:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 08:55, 19 December 2010
Film: American Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
A fact from The Nutcracker in 3D appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Albert Einstein
"Uncle Albert" is Albert Einstein. (source:[1]) Breawycker (talk) 22:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
"Uncle Albert" is not Albert Einstein. (source:[2]) BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 05:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
THIS IS THE BEST
This Is The best movie ever Jacob12190 (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs
Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.200.3.233 (talk) 08:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)