Jump to content

Talk:The Nutcracker in 3D: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:
== Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs ==
== Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs ==


Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com.
Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.200.3.233|75.200.3.233]] ([[User talk:75.200.3.233|talk]]) 08:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 08:55, 19 December 2010

WikiProject iconFilm: American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.


Albert Einstein

"Uncle Albert" is Albert Einstein. (source:[1]) Breawycker (talk) 22:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Uncle Albert" is not Albert Einstein. (source:[2]) BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 05:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS THE BEST

This Is The best movie ever Jacob12190 (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs

Critics don't like things that stray from their classical non-mainstream beliefs, so I wonder if the movie would have done well in wide release if critics weren't able to shoot it down. Remember, these are the same critics that seriously poo-pooed the first Star Wars movie (before it was released; not after they retrospectively noticed that everyone liked it). Personally, I loathe ballet and love science fiction and fantasy, so I was (and still am) really looking forward to this movie. I like the idea of a modern reinvention of a classic tale (that's been way too over-repeated in the classic ballet style). It's a fact that critics routinely (read: 99% of the time) give movie ratings that are at least one letter grade lower than user reviews at movies.yahoo.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.200.3.233 (talk) 08:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]