Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PhanuelB/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' We can't host this per BLP and other policies, there are plenty of other places on the Internet to host conspiracy theories. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 01:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' We can't host this per BLP and other policies, there are plenty of other places on the Internet to host conspiracy theories. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 01:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:STALEDRAFT]], also contains [[WP:BLP]] violations (eg. against the prosecutor), multiple instances of [[WP:SYNTH]]. [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ''<sup>'''('''[[User talk:MLauba|Talk]]''')'''</sup>'' 10:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:STALEDRAFT]], also contains [[WP:BLP]] violations (eg. against the prosecutor), multiple instances of [[WP:SYNTH]]. [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ''<sup>'''('''[[User talk:MLauba|Talk]]''')'''</sup>'' 10:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''oppose''' deletion - It was petty of you all to block him in the first place and he should be reinstated in the interest of hearing all sides of the kercher/knox/sollecito issue.. Deleting his sandbox is just more of the same pettiness.. Oppose ----- |
|||
Revision as of 16:27, 22 December 2010
Userspace being used to store a preferred version of an article. Not currently been worked on, nor is it likely to be, as this user is indefinitely blocked. pablo 11:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. This version of the article includes stuff like an allegation that the police tried to influence public opinion about the accused, before the trial. We shouldn't leave this lying around for search engines to find. Bluewave (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, WP:STALEDRAFT. MER-C 08:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Since this draft discusses living subjects, the WP:BLP policy should be adhered to. Given the indefinite block of the page creator, and the page's biased reporting of certain elements of the Murder of Meredith Kercher case, I agree that this should not be permitted to remain. SuperMarioMan 13:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, the user seems to be blocked and userspace isn't for storing a preferred version of an article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose This person should never have been blocked and was blocked due to unfair review. Wikipedia should unblock PhanuelB. WP:jaberryhill
- Oppose This editor was unfairly blocked and deserves to be reinstated. This page represents a lot of work and is a valuable resource. Kermugin (talk) 23:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note The above two editors have not edited since 26 September and 25 September respectively, and their entire Wikipedia careers have involved POV-pushing similar to PhanuelB's on this article. Draw your own conclusions. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete We can't host this per BLP and other policies, there are plenty of other places on the Internet to host conspiracy theories. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, also contains WP:BLP violations (eg. against the prosecutor), multiple instances of WP:SYNTH. MLauba (Talk) 10:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- oppose deletion - It was petty of you all to block him in the first place and he should be reinstated in the interest of hearing all sides of the kercher/knox/sollecito issue.. Deleting his sandbox is just more of the same pettiness.. Oppose -----