Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Dale Roberts: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Paul Dale Roberts: delete |
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Paranormal |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' as per nom. [[User:Autarch|Autarch]] ([[User talk:Autarch|talk]]) 02:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as per nom. [[User:Autarch|Autarch]] ([[User talk:Autarch|talk]]) 02:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Lack of references in article and through a Google search indicate that this person is not notable. Article seems promotional. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 06:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Lack of references in article and through a Google search indicate that this person is not notable. Article seems promotional. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 06:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Paranormal|list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 01:25, 24 December 2010
- Paul Dale Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources found to establish notability. Subject claims to have held a Guinness record for a single month in 1979. This article (and companion article Shannon McCabe) being maintained as a vehicle for self-promotional spam by IP and COI accounts ignoring warnings, removing tags, etc. LuckyLouie (talk) 00:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- warnings and requests were often repeated and immediately ignored.--S. Rich (talk) 02:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Autarch (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of references in article and through a Google search indicate that this person is not notable. Article seems promotional. Cullen328 (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)