Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danica Dillan

Danica Dillan

Danica Dillan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable pornographic actress. Fails WP:PORNBIO because she's only been nominated for one well-known award (AVN for 2011). Her ATK "awards" are not well known nor notable as they have not had any independent coverage. Fails general notability guidelines. Recommend that the article is userfied for the creator if she becomes notable later on. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

My English is bad.Sorry.1."Her ATK "awards" are not well known"-look this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_Teen_Kingdom and References In the bottom of page.At me simply it is impossible to add them.2.If there are these films - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Ain%27t_Avatar_XXX http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Sexipede there should be actors,Which in them "play":)3.Let's leave this page.Ths.Johnsmith877 (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2010

And still.Imagine... I the usual person, want to learn that such - The Human Sexipede... I look wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Sexipede... OK,cool...I Want to learn, who there plays...I look...hmm... Tom Byron...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Byron OK... Sunny Lane ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunny_Lane OK... Amber Rayne...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Rayne OK... Danica Dillan...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danica_Dillan Oops!pages aren't present! "It isn't well-known enough"... What to me a difference how much it is well-known,The information is necessary to me only. Listen Morbidthoughts. Wiki not a directory-"1 one million rich and well-known people". Wiki the en-cy-clo-pe-dia about all(Small-big;rich-poor;thick-thin;well-known-Not well-known) The most important thing - the information,the information on all. The information should be as much as possible full. Please keep page Danica Dillan.Thx.

Р.S.My english is bad.Sorry.

P.P.S."The best way to remain consecutive is to change together with circumstances"-Churchill.

Johnsmith877 (talk) 13:01, 20 December 2010

I understand your wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia argument, but the notability guidelines are still important. An article about a notable movie does not have to wikilink to everyone in its cast. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Simple question.Article about cinema is.Articles about all actors playing this cinema aren't present. Why? Censorship, how in China? :)Johnsmith877(talk) 22:44, 20 December 2010 — Johnsmith877 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking but censorship has nothing to do with this discussion. We have notability standards for pornographic actors. If they aren't notable enough, then they shouldn't get an article. Dismas|^(talk) 09:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Well.To me your logic is clear.You haven't understood me.I suggest to consider it,not only and it is not so much, as the pornoactress, but as the "actress" played a known film.After a while we should do page again.You haven't convinced me.I against page removal.

P.S.Сдаётся мне ,что Данила Багров был прав:)

Johnsmith877 (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - NN actress lacking WP:RS to support WP:PORNBIO inclusion criteria, or even WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 70.21.16.94 (talk · contribs) _{16:04, 24 December 2010 (UTC)}
• Keep - 208.87.243.66 (talk · contribs)_{18:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)}

• Our situation is similar to it - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant Happy Editing.--Johnsmith877 (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Keep — Nomination for a major award plus winning minor awards should be enough to establish notability. While not strictly the case with WP:PORNBIO, I would be inclined to be flexible and keep. Wexcan  Talk  19:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

She didn't really win minor awards. The ATK thing is a monthly feature like a centerfold for a pay website. If Playboy Playmates are not considered inherently notable,[1], neither are ATK babes of the month. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Dear Morbidthoughts .You are mistaken.Please Look at references--Johnsmith877 (talk) 08:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
• Comment - I still don't see any Significant coverage of the subject in those "references" (more like a casual mention), so I don't see them meeting even WP:GNG criteria for inclusion … just a relatively new porn actress who has yet to make a name for herself. — 70.21.16.94 (talk) 15:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)