Jump to content

Steinhaus–Moser notation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
"megiston", not "megistron"
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:
[[Category:Mathematical notation]][[Category:Large numbers]]
[[Category:Mathematical notation]][[Category:Large numbers]]
[[sl:Steinhausov mnogokotniški zapis]]
[[sl:Steinhausov mnogokotniški zapis]]
[[pl:symbol Steinhausa]]

Revision as of 18:09, 20 February 2006

In mathematics, Moser's polygon notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus's polygon notation.

n in a triangle (a number n in a triangle) means nn.

n in a square (a number n in a square) is equivalent with "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested."

n in a pentagon (a number n in a pentagon) is equivalent with "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested."

etc.: n written in an (m+1)-sided polygon is equivalent with "the number n inside n m-sided polygons, which are all nested."

Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle n in a circle, equivalent to the pentagon defined above.

Steinhaus defined:

  • "mega" is the number equivalent to 2 in a circle: 2 in a circle
  • "megiston" is the number equivalent to 10 in a circle: 10 in a circle

Moser's number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a "megagon" is a polygon with "mega" sides.

Alternative notations:

  • use the functions square(x) and triangle(x)
  • let M(n,m,p) be the number represented by the number n in m nested p-sided polygons; then the rules are:
and
    • mega = 
    • moser = 

Mega

Note that 2 in a circle is already a very large number, since 2 in a circle = square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) = square(triangle(22)) = square(triangle(4)) = square(44) = square(256) = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) [256 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) [255 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) [254 triangles] = ...

Using the other notation:

mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3)

With the function we have mega = where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power.

We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left):

  • M(256,2,3) =
  • M(256,3,3) =

Similarly:

  • M(256,4,3) ≈
  • M(256,5,3) ≈

etc.

Thus:

  • mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function .

Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈ , using Knuth's up-arrow notation.

Note that after the first few steps the value of is each time approximately equal to . In fact, it is even approximately equal to (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get:

  • ( is added to the 616)
  • ( is added to the , which is negligible; therefore just a 10 is added at the bottom)

...

  • mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function . Hence

Moser's number

It has been proven that Moser's number, although extremely large, is smaller than Graham's number.

Therefore, using the Conway chained arrow notation,

See also