User talk:Pelasgon

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 13:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

You deleted sourced edits and now you're leaving a message about vandalism to him?--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 18:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

(ignore trolling). The addition you made is considered original research, it has nothing to do with the source, and there fore specific parts have been removed.Alexikoua (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

in fact you should be ignored , in fact you are ignored by history , and all the undecent method you use ...maskara isn't it The material is not original research ,it is full of references and the coment about the author means that she should be taken seriusly.The changes you have made trasformed totally the view and hides the fact the who are really the Himariots ..and you of course..."gjaku yne i prishur" ..as fare as you go from this truth so fare you go from the true hellenisem Pelasgon (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Himarë, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bsherr (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here }} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 19:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pelasgon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

May some independent users and admin ,hard to find although ..should check you and your contributions in twisting sources ,facts and maps in all related Albanian of course and Greek articles and find out why a respectable contributors as me or any other will run to socketpupery as the only solution to not allow this ongoing masquerade performed by” greek” contributers to go any further..

As matter of fact ,i call also to realize the account of user:dodona which of course is not a vandal but a decent contributor of wiki group Albania with ways and manners only to be call straight and fair , by protecting the values ,contributions that history must offer to the generation of Albanians pure and unchanged or undistorted. I just would give a recent example of how a fully sourced text [11] was transformed into this one [12] while sourced ] ,treated first as unreliable sourced [13] although the author is reputational and fully referenced [14] at last when they not achieved to displace the source as unverifiable or original research ,they used this [15] by deleting the source from talk pages and finally open this discussion to nail me again. Pelasgon (talk) 2:57 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but at no point during your unblock request have you discussed your behavior or what led to your block. Do not blame others for your action or claim "socketpupery as the only solution". You may wish to read our guide to requesting unblocks. TNXMan 20:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Pelasgon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please accept my apologies of my behavior of doing disruptive edits and using different account and breaking so wiki rules although I felt that my block was unfair just by presenting a referenced discussion in a talk page to me unjustified [1] immediately after [2], I am being banned to edit from this date 9 April 2008 although repetitive request for unblock , I feel there is no excuse for breaking community basic rules but also that I have done my punishment more then I deserved for breaking such rules . A solution would be in your part while I take all my responsibilities to go according wiki regulations but also i would be sure that I am not going to be ban again just for opening a discussion in a talk page. Thank you Dodona

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please accept my apologies of my behavior of doing disruptive edits and using different account and breaking so wiki rules although I felt that my block was unfair just by presenting a referenced discussion in a talk page to me unjustified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arvanites/Archive_7#Parallels_of_Doric_Greek_and_Arvanites] immediately after [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Dodona&diff=204500923&oldid=204395979], I am being banned to edit from this date 9 April 2008 although repetitive request for unblock , I feel there is no excuse for breaking community basic rules but also that I have done my punishment more then I deserved for breaking such rules . A solution would be in your part while I take all my responsibilities to go according wiki regulations but also i would be sure that I am not going to be ban again just for opening a discussion in a talk page. Thank you [[user:Dodona|Dodona]] |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please accept my apologies of my behavior of doing disruptive edits and using different account and breaking so wiki rules although I felt that my block was unfair just by presenting a referenced discussion in a talk page to me unjustified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arvanites/Archive_7#Parallels_of_Doric_Greek_and_Arvanites] immediately after [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Dodona&diff=204500923&oldid=204395979], I am being banned to edit from this date 9 April 2008 although repetitive request for unblock , I feel there is no excuse for breaking community basic rules but also that I have done my punishment more then I deserved for breaking such rules . A solution would be in your part while I take all my responsibilities to go according wiki regulations but also i would be sure that I am not going to be ban again just for opening a discussion in a talk page. Thank you [[user:Dodona|Dodona]] |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please accept my apologies of my behavior of doing disruptive edits and using different account and breaking so wiki rules although I felt that my block was unfair just by presenting a referenced discussion in a talk page to me unjustified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arvanites/Archive_7#Parallels_of_Doric_Greek_and_Arvanites] immediately after [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Dodona&diff=204500923&oldid=204395979], I am being banned to edit from this date 9 April 2008 although repetitive request for unblock , I feel there is no excuse for breaking community basic rules but also that I have done my punishment more then I deserved for breaking such rules . A solution would be in your part while I take all my responsibilities to go according wiki regulations but also i would be sure that I am not going to be ban again just for opening a discussion in a talk page. Thank you [[user:Dodona|Dodona]] |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}