Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Boogie For Jesus!: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
*'''Delete ALL''' as unremarkable. --&nbsp;[[User:Krash|Krash]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Krash|Talk]])</small> 18:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete ALL''' as unremarkable. --&nbsp;[[User:Krash|Krash]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Krash|Talk]])</small> 18:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The group has a thirty year history, has produced several albums, satisfies [[WP:MUSIC]], has worked with some major players, and done all this while essentially being a niche band. We have many articles about more obscue subjects. The articles on albums should probably be merged and redirected, but the group article is certainly valid. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] 19:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The group has a thirty year history, has produced several albums, satisfies [[WP:MUSIC]], has worked with some major players, and done all this while essentially being a niche band. We have many articles about more obscue subjects. The articles on albums should probably be merged and redirected, but the group article is certainly valid. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] 19:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' all, except ''possibly'' Salvation Air Force, as non-notable. [[User Talk:JzG|<span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">Guy</span>]] 23:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:31, 20 February 2006

An easter-egg advert for the external link. Google search for "Let's Boogie for Jesus" returns 5 hits of which (worryingly) this is the top one. RobertGtalk 10:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the rest of this walled garden, many of which have been contested nominations at WP:PROP.

--RobertGtalk 11:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]