Jump to content

Talk:Spike protein: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Igor/0.1.9: Project Viruses re-assessment: Stub-class (No-importance)
m Quality: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=Stub}}

== Quality ==

So is the term ''peplomer'' to be considered current terminology or not? If it is not, then that fact should be mentioned early, not after (pointlessly) describing specific ''usage''. Also, if it is not currently used, what are the current terms? This is a technical term, for which we reading the definition precisely because someone (on another page) ''used'' it. We then read the definition and examples of its usage, and are then told we should not use it. Unfortunately, we are unable to comply with this helpful suggestion, due to the lack of an approved term! [[User:Aboctok|Aboctok]] ([[User talk:Aboctok|talk]]) 20:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:18, 30 December 2010

WikiProject iconViruses Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Quality

So is the term peplomer to be considered current terminology or not? If it is not, then that fact should be mentioned early, not after (pointlessly) describing specific usage. Also, if it is not currently used, what are the current terms? This is a technical term, for which we reading the definition precisely because someone (on another page) used it. We then read the definition and examples of its usage, and are then told we should not use it. Unfortunately, we are unable to comply with this helpful suggestion, due to the lack of an approved term! Aboctok (talk) 20:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]