Talk:Spike protein: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Igor/0.1.9: Project Viruses re-assessment: Stub-class (No-importance) |
m →Quality: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=Stub}} |
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=Stub}} |
||
== Quality == |
|||
So is the term ''peplomer'' to be considered current terminology or not? If it is not, then that fact should be mentioned early, not after (pointlessly) describing specific ''usage''. Also, if it is not currently used, what are the current terms? This is a technical term, for which we reading the definition precisely because someone (on another page) ''used'' it. We then read the definition and examples of its usage, and are then told we should not use it. Unfortunately, we are unable to comply with this helpful suggestion, due to the lack of an approved term! [[User:Aboctok|Aboctok]] ([[User talk:Aboctok|talk]]) 20:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:18, 30 December 2010
Viruses Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Quality
So is the term peplomer to be considered current terminology or not? If it is not, then that fact should be mentioned early, not after (pointlessly) describing specific usage. Also, if it is not currently used, what are the current terms? This is a technical term, for which we reading the definition precisely because someone (on another page) used it. We then read the definition and examples of its usage, and are then told we should not use it. Unfortunately, we are unable to comply with this helpful suggestion, due to the lack of an approved term! Aboctok (talk) 20:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)