Talk:History of African presence in London

African as a noun? surely that's not appropriate... Paulbrock 01:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

(page now moved) Paulbrock 15:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Africans in London or England

It might be interesting to mention that Africans had been brought to England/Scotland long before the 1600's and had already integrated into society. The Romans brought a garrison of Africans to help fight at Hadrian's Wall and then left them there. They might have also been used to mine resources. But were they black in the sense of looking like Usain Bolt? They would have been North Africans rather than sub-Saharan Africans.

Likely mistyping

Google finds South bark bridge only in this article. Should barkbe bank? Though what does South bank bridge mean? Is Southwark bridge better?--SilasW 15:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC) - I'm pretty sure it's Southwark Bridge, I remember reading something about it.--Lopakhin (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC) (edited)

Poor quality

This articles is of such poor quality, especially the language. It is, quite frankly, terribly written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HSDR (talk • contribs) 21:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

The title isn't great to start with. 'History of black people in London' might be better or 'Black immigration to London'. The first line could do with expanding a bit.--Lopakhin (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)