User talk:Raul-Reus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:55, 6 January 2011

Estoy de acuerdo. He puesto en la tabla clasificatoria compartiendo posición a aquellos equipos que tengan los mismos puntos en el fair-play para hacerlo más justo :) Qampunen (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 Valencia CF season

Hello friend, I want to thank you for creating this page and updating it throughout the season. I will try to chip in whenever possible as Valencia is my favorite Club. However I have a question, Why is Soldado listed as the top scorer? He scored only in the pre-season friendlies and I do not think those matches count towards goal totals or any kind of statistics. Take care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.218.244 (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am just looking at other teams seasons like Real Madrid and Barcelona who do not count pre-season friendlies statistics. I agree it is not a very important thing. I just though I'd point it out in an effort to standardize Spanish clubs seasons pages. Once again, great work on the Valencia page! Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.218.244 (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

I tried my best to explain you the sittuation. I dont expect beeing insulted for that on my talkpage.

It was YOU who tagged your own upload with commons:Template:Fair use - that template is a request for imidiate deletion of the upload, your request was fulfilled.
It was you who not read what Commons is. Commons is a project for free content only(!), a projet that not allows for fair use in any form as e.g. Wikipedia allows. Uploads that are not free content will get deleted on Commons. I explained this to you.

Also Wikipedia is a free content project (the free encyclopedia), but Wikipedia allows for fair use. You can upload logos here on this project, en.wikipedia.org, with a {{Non-free use rationale}}. As a courtesy I already copy&pasted the file description on your talkpage so you can copy&paste it again. Uploading files with non-free use rationals is what you tried on Wikimedia Commons where it is forbidden. This simple to understand information is clearly written in all basic instructions on Commons, including the upload form that you used - so the information was written directly in front of your nose and you completely failed to read it. You can not read but you can insult people... great. Good bye. --Martin H. (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know very well that Commons must be only about free media ARE YOU VERY SURE THAT I CAN'T REALISE THAT SITUATION? DO YOU THINK THAT PERSONS WHICH COLLABORATE 5 YEARS AGO CAN'T REALISE THAT?, and I know that for non free logos can be specified a Template for non rationale use of non-free media, I put these Template and I comply with all conditios to accept a non free imnage: low resolution, and others specifications as other persons puts others non free media. But you ignore all conditions and my efforts to comply all requirements. Elche CF logo was like a own work, but you delete this without any check about this. Finally, I realise that Commons are administred by dictatorships like you which can't let collaborate new people. My only labour on Wikipedia is collaborate and help others to make a Wikipedia which can edit everybody contrutively, not for damage actions of others like you. Bye bye, don't move from Brazil!!

Moved that back from my talkpage. Again, you dont understand:

and I know that for non free logos can be specified a Template for non rationale use of non-free media

NO !, this works on Wikipedia but not on Commons! Commons not allows any non free media, without any exceptions! Damn! Read the commons:Commons:First steps please!

English Wikipedia = en.wikipedia.org = Logos are OK, fair use is allowed
Commons = commons.wikimedia.org = Different project, Logos are NOT OK!!!!! fair use is forbidden.

Please do me the favor and klick on commons:Template:Fair_use/es. Dont you understand that you selected the wrong project for your logo upload? Other logos are NOT upload to Commons but here, localy, on Wikipedia. File:Elche Club de Fútbol.png is not a file on Commons but Wikipedia! You can upload files here under fair use, but you can not upload any non-free files to Commons! Dont you understand? --Martin H. (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As I said: you find the file description inside the collapsible wrapper on commons:User_talk:Raul-Reus#Re: Football logos. If you use/copy&paste that templates on Wikipedia it will show up correctly, on Commons the templates lead to speedy deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta

Hola REUS, VASCO de Portugal al habla,

sí, de acuerdo, tengo que mejorar mis sumarios, eso es cierto. También es cierto que soy un poco perfeccionista, no es una escusa para mis modos en algunas situaciones, no señor.

Perdona por las molestias que te haya podido ocasionar, saludos y buena semana. Hasta otra - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, ya lo sabía, Reus es una ciudad en Cataluña. En su club de fútbol, ha ocurrido otra tragedia del balompié, con Jordi Pitarque, en paz descanse el chaval. Como tu nombre en WIKI es ese, sin embargo, opté por escribirlo todo (Raul-Reus). Que todo vaya bien, saludos de nuevo! - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mil gracias

Hola, Raúl. Durante las últimas tres temporadas actualizaba Primera, Segunda, Segunda B, Tercera, Copa del Rey, mercados de fichajes... cada semana sin retrasos la mayoría de las veces que me era posible. Por circunstancias me resulta imposible editar estos últimos meses y espero volver pronto. Sólo quiero agradecerte el gran trabajo que estás haciendo con la Primera División y la Segunda División. He intentado ver qué ha cambiado en el artículo pero hay ciertas cosas que resultan incómodas de editar con numerosos templates. Me agrada mucho saber que hay gente dedicada como tú a actualizar lo que uno hacía hace tiempo. Lo dicho, sigue así y puede que pronto podamos actualizar el fútbol español con la mitad de trabajo y de forma muy eficiente. Mil gracias, y no te preocupes que el Gimnástic seguro que se salva! Qampunen (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, entiendo perfectamente lo del Zamora. Simplemente hago el 73,7% de los partidos que se han jugado para ponerlos. Es más justo. Marca solía poner los que más partidos habían jugado hasta que cumpliesen 28 partidos. Lo corregiré enseguida. En cuanto a lo del fair-play, ¿se ordenan acorde a lo que calculamos nosotros o a lo que calcula la RFEF? Gracias, y haré lo mismo para el Zamora en Segunda División. Mis disculpas. Qampunen (talk) 11:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por explicarme cómo llegar al acta oficial del árbitro. Conocía la sección de actas pero no que las amonestaciones estuviesen tan bien explicadas en otra. Muchas gracias, y si te parece bien, puedo actualizar el fair-play cuando me sea posible si veo que lleva sin actualizar un buen rato depués de salir el acta. Gracias y disculpas por mis errores. Qampunen (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, si quieres conseguir las actas más rápidamente pon un acta cualquiera ya actualizada (como el Getafe-Villarreal por y cambias los últimos números en la dirección URL de la página a la correspondiente del Sevilla-Almería en este caso (es decir, cambias http://actas.rfef.es/actas/RFEF_CmpActa2?cod_primaria=1000144&CodActa=12529 a http://actas.rfef.es/actas/RFEF_CmpActa2?cod_primaria=1000144&CodActa=12530. Las actas están actualizadas rápidamente y tardan en publicarlas. Qampunen (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pequeño Gran Favor

Eso sería el broche final del proyecto. No sé cómo se podría hacer, pero sería estupendo que se pudiese conseguir. Mientras tanto habrá que hacerlo manualmente, pero ojalá que en un futuro no muy lejano lo que propones se convierta en una realidad. Un saludo. Qampunen (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, no voy a poder editar esta tarde hasta pasadas las 22:00, ¿de acuerdo?. Si pudieses ayudarme en Segunda esta tarde genial, pero si no puedes no pasa nada. Por cierto, ¿quieres editar el grupo de las Baleares (XI) de Tercera? Qampunen (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, Raúl. Sobre el nombre de las comunidades en cada grupo, está puesto en el artículo Tercera División por lo que no debería ser un problema. Qampunen (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tercera

Raúl, si hoy eres el último en actualizar las tablas, cambia lo de "last updated" en la parte superior del artículo de Tercera. Lo haremos así (el último cambia la fecha). Un saludo. Qampunen (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Como eran muy pocos partidos y he visto que estás ocupado he editado el grupo VI y XI por ti. Gracias por ayudarme el domingo y gracias en general por todo tu trabajo. Qampunen (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, te he editado el grupo VI (solo había un partido) ya que es tarde y seguro que estás ocupado. Feliz año! Qampunen (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, haré todo lo que me sea posible durante ese tiempo (haré los grupos V, VI y XI de Tercera durante ese tiempo). Avísame cuando vuelvas. Un saludo, amigo! Qampunen (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 No te preocupes, haré todo lo que me sea posible durante ese tiempo (haré los grupos V, VI y XI de Tercera durante ese tiempo). Avísame cuando vuelvas. Un saludo, amigo! [[User:Qampunen|Qampunen]] ([[User talk:Qampunen|talk]]) 23:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
-== 2010–11 Valencia CF season ==
-Please do not revert the removal of non-free images as icons - this usage is not allowed per [[WP:NFCC#3a]] and [[WP:NFCC#8]].  Thanks. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 10:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
-* In response to your extremely uncivil posting on my talkpage, I will explain again.  Hopefully, this time you will read and understand it. At Wikipedia, we have policies for editing.  Now, you might think they are "strictly stupid rules" but they are the rules.  One of them is [[WP:NFCC]], our rules on non-free images.  You cannot use non-free images as icons, because they fail three parts of that policy.  Per [[WP:NFCC#1]] the images are replaceable, because they can be replaced by text.  Per [[WP:NFCC#3a]], you must use the minimum number of non-free images possible - in this case, that number is zero.  And per [[WP:NFCC#8]], you may only use non-free images if it significantly increases the reader's understanding - in this case, it doesn't, because a link saying "Gol TV" is just as understandable as an icon.  In fact, it's probably ''more'' obvious.  Thus, I have reverted your edit again.  I will now make it very clear that such blatant violations of our policies are '''not''' acceptable - if you replace the non-free images again, you may find yourself blocked. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 13:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)