Prevalence of circumcision: Difference between revisions
→United States: South Carolina withdraws funding eff Feb 1, 2011 |
|||
Line 338: | Line 338: | ||
===80% or more=== |
===80% or more=== |
||
[[Israel]],<ref name="WHO" /><ref name="ynet1106">{{cite web |title=Israel teaches WHO about circumcision |publisher=ynet news |month=November |year=2006 |url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3333564,00.html}}</ref> [[South Korea]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Bangladesh]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Pakistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Afghanistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Azerbaijan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Bahrain]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Brunei]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Tajikistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Kyrgyzstan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Uzbekistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Turkmenistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Iran]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Iraq]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Kuwait]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Syria]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Lebanon]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Jordan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Saudi Arabia]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Yemen]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Oman]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[United Arab Emirates]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Qatar]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Malaysia]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Turkey]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Philippines]].<ref name="castellsague" /> |
[[Israel]],<ref name="WHO" /><ref name="ynet1106">{{cite web |title=Israel teaches WHO about circumcision |publisher=ynet news |month=November |year=2006 |url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3333564,00.html}}</ref> [[South Korea]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Bangladesh]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Pakistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Afghanistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Azerbaijan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Bahrain]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Brunei]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Tajikistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Kyrgyzstan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Uzbekistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Turkmenistan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Iran]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Iraq]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Kuwait]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Syria]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Lebanon]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Jordan]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Saudi Arabia]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Yemen]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Oman]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[United Arab Emirates]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Qatar]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Malaysia]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Turkey]],<ref name="WHO" /> [[Philippines]].<ref name="castellsague" /> |
||
The overall prevalence of circumcision in the Philippines is reported to be 92.5%.<ref name="castellsague" /> Most circumcision in the Philippines are performed at the age of 11 to 13.{{Citation needed|date=February 2008}} |
The overall prevalence of circumcision in the Philippines is reported to be 92.5%.<ref name="castellsague" /> Most circumcision in the Philippines are performed at the age of 11 to 13.{{Citation needed|date=February 2008}} |
||
Revision as of 08:34, 11 January 2011
The prevalence of circumcision (or circumcision rate) refers to the proportion of males that are circumcised in a given population. It may also refer to the proportion of newborn males that are circumcised.
The World Health Organisation estimates that as of 2006, 30% to 33% of males aged 15 or older (or approximately 665 million men or boys) are circumcised worldwide.[1] Estimates of the proportion of all males that are circumcised worldwide include one sixth,[2] one third,[3] and between 30 and 40%.[4] Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia have seen a decline in male circumcision,[5] while there are indications of increasing demand in Southern Africa.[6]
The following list states the proportion of males circumcised by country.
Africa
Studies indicate that about 62% of African males are circumcised overall. However, these rates differ by region, ethnic and religious groups.[7] Williams, B.G. et al. comment that "Most of the currently available data on the prevalence of [male circumcision] are several decades old, while several of the recent studies were carried out as adjuncts to demographic and health surveys and were not designed to determine the prevalence of [male circumcision]."[8]
Country | Rate (Williams, B.G. et al.[8]) | Rate (WHO [5]) |
---|---|---|
Angola | 66 | >80 |
Central African Republic | 67 | 20-80 |
Chad | 64 | >80 |
Republic of the Congo | 70 | >80 |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | 70 | >80 |
Gabon | 93 | >80 |
Burundi | 2 | <20 |
Djibouti | 94 | >80 |
Eritrea | 95 | >80 |
Ethiopia | 76 | >80 |
Kenya | 84 | >80 |
Rwanda | 10 | <20 |
Somalia | 93 | >80 |
Sudan | 47 | 20-80 |
Tanzania | 70 | 20-80 |
Uganda | 25 | 20-80 |
Botswana | 25 | <20 |
Lesotho | 0 | 20-80 |
Malawi | 17 | <20 |
Mozambique | 56 | 20-80 |
Namibia | 15 | <20 |
South Africa | 35 | 20-80 |
Swaziland | 50 | <20 |
Zambia | 12 | <20 |
Zimbabwe | 10 | <20 |
Benin | 84 | >80 |
Burkina Faso | 89 | >80 |
Cameroon | 93 | >80 |
Equatorial Guinea | 86 | >80 |
Gambia | 90 | >80 |
Ghana | 95 | >80 |
Guinea | 83 | >80 |
Guinea-Bissau | 91 | >80 |
Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) | 93 | 20-80 |
Liberia | 70 | >80 |
Mali | 95 | >80 |
Mauritania | 78 | >80 |
Niger | 92 | >80 |
Nigeria | 81 | >80 |
Senegal | 89 | >80 |
Sierra Leone | 90 | >80 |
Togo | 93 | >80 |
Less than 20%
Rwanda,[5] Burundi,[5] Zambia,[5] Zimbabwe,[5] Malawi,[5] Botswana,[5] Namibia,[5] Swaziland,[5] Canary,Is. (Spain).[5]
Between 20 and 80%
[5] Central African Republic,[5] Sudan,[5] Uganda,[5] Tanzania,[5] Mozambique,[5] South Africa,[5] Lesotho.[5]
80% or more
Algeria,[5] Morocco,[5] Mauritania,[5] Tunisia,[5] Libya,[5] Egypt,[5] Mali,[5] Senegal,[5] Gambia,[5] Guinea-Bissau,[5] Guinea,[5] Liberia,[5] Sierra Leone,[5] Ghana,[5] Togo,[5] Benin,[5] Burkina Faso,[5] Niger,[5] Nigeria,[5] Chad,[5] Cameroon,[5] Equatorial Guinea,[5] Gabon,[5] Republic of the Congo,[5] Democratic Republic of the Congo,[5] Eritrea,[5] Ethiopia,[5] Djibouti,[5] Somalia,[5] Kenya,[5] Angola,[5] Mauritius,[5] Madagascar.[5] Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast).[5]
Americas
Less than 20%
Mexico,[5] Belize,[5] Costa Rica,[5] El Salvador,[5] Guatemala,[5] Honduras,[5] Nicaragua,[5] Panama,[5] Cuba,[5] Jamaica,[5] Haiti,[5] Dominican Republic,[5] Puerto Rico,[5] Argentina,[5] Bolivia,[5] Brazil,[5] Chile,[5] Colombia,[5] Ecuador,[5] French Guiana,[5] Guyana,[5] Paraguay,[5] Peru,[5]Trinidad and Tobago,[5] Uruguay,[5] Venezuela.[5]
The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6.9% in Colombia, and 7.4% in Brazil (13% in Rio de Janeiro).[9]
The prevalence of circumcision in Mexico is estimated to be 10% to 31%.[10]
Between 20 and 80%
United States
Statistics from different sources give widely varying estimates of infant circumcision rates in the United States.
In 2005, about 56 percent of male newborns were circumcised prior to release from the hospital according to statistics from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.[11]
Data from a national survey conducted from 1999 to 2002 found that the overall prevalence of male circumcision in the United States was 79%.[12] 91% of men born in the 1970s, and 83% of boys born in the 1980s were circumcised.[12] An earlier survey, conducted in 1992, found a circumcision prevalence of 77% in US-born men, born from 1932–1974, including 81% of non-Hispanic White men, 65% of Black men, and 54% of Hispanic men, vs. 42% of non U.S. born men who were circumcised.[13]
A recent study, which used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (a sample of 5-7 million of the nation's total inpatient stays, and representing a 20% sample taken from 8 states in 1988 and 28 in 2000), stated that neonatal circumcisions rose from 48.3% of males in 1988 to 61.1% in 1997.[14]
Figures from the 2003 Nationwide Hospital Discharge Survey state that circumcision rates declined from 64.7% in 1980 to 59.0% in 1990, rose to 64.1% in 1995, and fell again to 55.9% in 2003.[15] On page 52, it is shown that the western region of the United States has seen the most significant change, declining from 61.8% in 1980 to 31.4% in 2003.[15] Part of the decline in the western region has been attributed by some experts to an increasing percentage of births to immigrants from Latin America, who have been shown to be less likely to circumcise than other parents in the U.S.[16] A 2008 study of male infants born in the US state of Maryland found that the circumcision rate was 75.3% based on hospital discharge data files, and 82.3% based on maternal post-partum survey data.[17]
There are various explanations for why the infant circumcision rate in the United States are different from comparable countries. Many parents’ decisions about circumcision are preconceived, and this may contribute to the high rate of elective circumcision. [18]
Medicaid funding for infant circumcision used to be available in all 50 states but, starting with California in 1982, 17 states have eliminated Medicaid coverage of routine (non-therapeutic) circumcision. In 2006, Hawaii and Vermont introduced resolutions questioning the public funding of male circumcision.[19][verification needed] One study in the Midwest of the U.S. found that this had no effect on the newborn circumcision rate but it did affect the demand for circumcision at a later time.[20] Another study, published in early 2009, found a difference in the neonatal male circumcision rate of 24% between states with and without medicaid coverage. The study was controlled for other factors such as the percentage of Hispanic patients.[21]
Schoen states that the "80% to 85% US circumcision rate observed in practice contrasts with the 55% to 65% rate reported in statistics collected from birth centers across the nation". The explanation he offers is that "the published results of national statistical surveys represent only coded diagnoses obtained from birth centers; the reported figures do not include males who are circumcised at a later date for religious, medical, or personal reasons or who received newborn circumcision that was not coded."[22]
Canada
A survey of Canadian maternity practices conducted in 2006/2007 by the national public health agency found a newborn circumcision rate of 31.9%.[23] Rates varied markedly across the country, from close to zero in Newfoundland and Labrador to 44.3% in Alberta.
Percentage of mothers reporting having their male baby circumcised, by province and territory, Canada, 2006/2007 | |
Newfoundland and Labrador | * |
Prince Edward Island | 39.2 |
Nova Scotia | 6.8 |
New Brunswick | 18.0 |
Quebec | 12.3 |
Ontario | 43.7 |
Manitoba | 31.6 |
Saskatchewan | 35.6 |
Alberta | 44.3 |
British Columbia | 30.2 |
Yukon | * |
Northwest Territories | 9.7 |
Nunavut | * |
Canada | 31.9 |
* Numerator too small for rate calculation | |
Source: Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey[23] |
In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics reported that “in Canada, ~48% of males are circumcised”.[24] However, this figure was questioned because the only citation provided for it was an Australian paper dating from 1970.[25] The Canadian Paediatric Society cites an estimate of 48% for the prevalence of male circumcision in Canada in 1970.[26]
Articles published in 2003 reported Canadian neonatal male circumcision rates of "10 to 30%"[20] and "less than 17%".[27] According to the Halifax Daily News, the infant circumcision rate in 2003 was "just 1.1 per cent" in Nova Scotia and nil in Newfoundland.[28] In 1994/95, the newborn circumcision rate in Ontario was 299.1 per thousand or 29.9%.[29]
Asia
Less than 20%
Russia,[5] Mongolia,[5] China,[5] Taiwan,[5] North Korea,[5] India,[5] Sri Lanka,[5] Nepal,[5] Bhutan,[5] Burma,[5] Thailand,[5] Laos,[5] Vietnam,[5] Cambodia,[5] Japan,[5] Papua New Guinea.[5]
The overall prevalence of circumcision in Thailand is reportedly 13.3%.[9] The Irish government estimates that fewer than one percent of males are circumcised in China and Japan.[30]
Between 20 and 80%
80% or more
Israel,[5][31] South Korea,[5] Bangladesh,[5] Pakistan,[5] Afghanistan,[5] Azerbaijan,[5] Bahrain,[5] Brunei,[5] Tajikistan,[5] Kyrgyzstan,[5] Uzbekistan,[5] Turkmenistan,[5] Iran,[5] Iraq,[5] Kuwait,[5] Syria,[5] Lebanon,[5] Jordan,[5] Saudi Arabia,[5] Yemen,[5] Oman,[5] United Arab Emirates,[5] Qatar,[5] Malaysia,[5] Turkey,[5] Philippines.[9] The overall prevalence of circumcision in the Philippines is reported to be 92.5%.[9] Most circumcision in the Philippines are performed at the age of 11 to 13.[citation needed]
According to Dr. Inon Schenker of the Jerusalem AIDS Project, "about 100 percent of men have been circumcised" in Israel.[31]
According to the World Health Organisation, 80% or more of males in South Korea are circumcised.[5] A 2001 study of 20-year old South Korean men found that 78% were circumcised. [32] The authors comment "South Korea has possibly the largest absolute number of teenage or adult circumcisions anywhere in the world. Because circumcision started through contact with the American military during the Korean War, South Korea has an unusual history of circumcision."
Europe
Less than 20%
The following countries have a circumcision rate of less than 20%: Iceland,[5] United Kingdom,[5][33] Ireland, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Slovakia, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, Austria, Belarus, Cyprus, Georgia.[5]
A national survey on sexual attitudes in 2000 found that 15.8% of men or boys in the United Kingdom (ages 16–44) were circumcised. 11.7% of 16-19 year olds, and 19.6% of 40-44 year olds said they had been circumcised. It also found that, apart from black Caribbeans, men born overseas were more likely to be circumcised.[33] Rickwood et al. reported that the proportion of English boys circumcised for medical reasons had fallen from 35% in the early 1930s to 6.5% by the mid-1980s. An estimated 3.8% of male children in the UK in 2000 were being circumcised by the age of 15.[34] The researchers stated that too many boys, especially under the age of 5, were still being circumcised because of a misdiagnosis of phimosis. They called for a target to reduce the percentage to 2%.
Denniston reported in 1996 that the neonatal circumcision rate in Finland is zero and that the rate of later circumcision is 1 in 16,667.[35] Similarly, Wallerstein estimated in 1980 that the Finnish rate of adult circumcision for health reasons is six per 100,000.[36] Schoen et al., however, reported in 2006 that data from 1996-1998 indicate a circumcision rate of about 7.1%;[37] Houle reported the same figure in 2007.[38] Finland's Ministry of Social Affairs and Health reported in 2004 that, "some 500-1000 circumcisions are performed as a therapeutic measure annually in Finnish hospitals",[39] amounting to 710 nationwide cases in 2002.[40]
The overall prevalence of circumcision in Spain is reported to be 1.8%.[9]
In 1986, only 511 out of approximately 478,000 Danish boys aged 0–14 years were circumcised. This corresponds to a cumulative national circumcision rate of around 1.6% by the age of 15 years.[41]
Between 20 and 80%
Bosnia,[5] Serbia,[5] Montenegro,[5] Albania,[5] Macedonia.[5]
Not known
Luxembourg,[5] Croatia,[5] Andorra[5]
Map unclear
Monaco, San Marino, Vatican City, Liechtenstein, Malta
Oceania
Less than 20%
According to the World Health Organisation, fewer than 20% of males are circumcised in New Zealand.[5] In a study of men born in 1972-1973 in Dunedin, 40.2% were circumcised.[42] In a study of men born in 1977 in Christchurch, 26.1% were circumcised.[43] A 1991 survey conducted in Waikato found that 7% of male infants were circumcised.[44]
Between 20 and 80%
A survey of Australian men, conducted in 2001-2002, reported that 58.7% were circumcised.[45]
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the infant circumcision rate in Australia was 12.9% as of 2003. However, rates in the states varied, with highest rates in Queensland (19.3%), New South Wales (16.3%) and South Australia (14.3%), and the lowest in Tasmania (1.6%).[46] In New South Wales, rates have risen from 13% in 1999 to 18% in 2009.[47] Non-therapeutic infant circumcision is no longer provided in public hospitals in New South Wales, Tasmania, Western Australia, Victoria, and South Australia.[48][49]
References
Constructs such as ibid., loc. cit. and idem are discouraged by Wikipedia's style guide for footnotes, as they are easily broken. Please improve this article by replacing them with named references (quick guide), or an abbreviated title. (June 2010) |
- ^ Male circumcision - global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability by World Health Organization, UNAIDS, UNICEF, UNFPA ,ANRS and World Bank
- ^ Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Brit J Surg. 1993;80:1231-6. (full text)
- ^ Crawford, DA (2002). "Circumcision: a consideration of some of the controversy". Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community. 6 (4): 259–70. doi:10.1177/136749350200600403. PMID 12503896.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|author-name-separator=
(help); Unknown parameter|author-separator=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Kravetz, R E (2007). "Circumcision kit". Am J Gastroenterol. 102 (4): 714–715. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01081.x. PMID 17397403.
In fact, it is estimated that the worldwide circumcision rate is between 30% and 40%.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db dc dd de df dg dh di dj dk dl dm dn do dp dq dr ds dt du dv dw dx dy dz ea eb ec ed ee ef eg "Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention: insert 2" (PDF). World Health Organisation. p. 2.
- ^ "Demand for male circumcision rises in a bid to prevent HIV" (PDF). Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 84 (7): 505–588. 2006.
As a result, there are already indications of increasing demand for male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising societies in southern Africa.
- ^ "Questions and answers: NIAID-sponsored adult male circumcision trials in Kenya and Uganda". National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. 2006.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ a b Williams, B G (2006). "The potential impact of male circumcision on HIV in sub-Saharan Africa". PLos Med. 3 (7): e262. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030262. PMC 1489185. PMID 16822094.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|note=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c d e Castellsagué, X (2005). "Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female partners of circumcised and uncircumcised adult men". Am J Epidemiol. 162 (9): 907–916. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi284. PMID 16177149.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Lajous, M (2006). "Human papillomavirus link to circumcision is misleading (author's reply)". Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15 (2): 405–6. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0818. PMID 16492939.
Circumcision is not usually performed by public sector health care providers in Mexico and we estimate the prevalence to be 10% to 31%, depending on the population.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Circumcisions Performed in U.S. Community Hospitals, 2005". Statistical Brief #45. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). January, 2008. Retrieved 2010-08-29.
In 2005, about 56 percent of newborn boys were circumcised before their release from the hospital, resulting in over 1.2 million circumcisions performed at U.S. community hospitals.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b Xu, F, L Markowitz, M Sternberg, and S Aral (2006). "Prevalence of circumcision in men in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2002". XVI International AIDS Conference. Retrieved 2006-09-21.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Laumann, EO (1997). "Circumcision in the United States". JAMA. 277 (13): 1052–1057. doi:10.1001/jama.277.13.1052. PMID 9091693.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Nelson, CP. (2005). "The increasing incidence of newborn circumcision: data from the nationwide inpatient sample" (Abstract). Journal of Urology. 173 (3): 978–981. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000145758.80937.7d. PMID 15711354. ISSN 0022-5347 PMID 15711354. Retrieved 2006-09-21.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ a b Kozak, LJ (2006). "National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2003 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data" (PDF). Vital Health Statistics. 13 (160). Retrieved 2007-01-30.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Trends in circumcisions among newborns". Health E-Stats. National Center for Health Statistics. January 11, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-30.
However, the most notable change occurred in the West where newborn male circumcisions dropped from 62 percent in 1980 to 37 percent in 1999. This latest available figure for the West represents over a two-fold difference when compared with circumcision estimates for the Midwest. Part of this decline, appears to reflect the increasing percentage of boys born to immigrant Hispanics, who have been shown in several other studies to be significantly less likely to receive circumcisions than other infant males.
- ^ Cheng, D. (August 6, 2008). "Neonatal circumcision in Maryland: A comparison of hospital discharge and maternal postpartum survey data". Journal of Pediatric Urology. (e-pub ahead of print) (6): 448–51. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.06.007. PMID 18691938.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Report 10 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (I-99):Neonatal Circumcision". 1999 AMA Interim Meeting: Summaries and Recommendations of Council on Scientific Affairs Reports. American Medical Association. 1999. p. 17. Retrieved 2006-06-13.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "Circumcision and infection". Children's health. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2006.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|url=
(help) - ^ a b Quayle, SS. (2003). "The effect of health care coverage on circumcision rates among newborns". Journal of Urology. 170 (4 Pt 2): 1533–1536. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000091215.99513.0f. PMID 14501653. ISSN 0022-5347 PMID 14501653.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^
Leibowitz, Arleen A. (January 2009). "Determinants and Policy Implications of Male Circumcision in the United States". American Journal of Public Health. 99 (1). American Public Health Association: 138–145. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.134403. PMC 2636604. PMID 19008503. Retrieved July 1, 2009.
The mean neonatal male circumcision rate was 55.9%. When we controlled for other factors, hospitals in states in which Medicaid covers routine male circumcision had circumcision rates that were 24 percentage points higher than did hospitals in states without such coverage (P < .001).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|trans_title=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Schoen, Edgar J. (2006). "Ignoring evidence of circumcision benefits". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 385–387. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2881. PMID 16818586. ISSN 0031-4005 PMID 16818586. Retrieved 2006-09-21.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ a b "Data Tables - The Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) 2006-2007 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey" (PDF). Public Health Agency of Canada. p. 267.
- ^ "American Academy of Pediatrics: circumcision policy statement". Pediatrics. 103 (3): 686–693. 1999. doi:10.1542/peds.103.3.686. PMID 10049981.
- ^ Antonopoulos, John; Herschel;, M.; Bartman;, T.; Andersson;, C.; Bailis;, S. A.; Shechet, R. J.; Tanenbaum;, B.; Kunin;, S. A.; Hodges, F. M. (2000). "Circumcision---The Debates Goes On". Pediatrics. 105 (3): 684. doi:10.1542/peds.105.3.681. PMID 10733391. Retrieved 2007-11-15.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Neonatal Circumcision Revisited". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 154 (6): 769–780. 1996. PMC 1487803. PMID 8634956.
- ^ Waldeck S (2003). "Using Male Circumcision to Understand Social Norms as Multipliers". University of Cincinnati Law Review. 72: 455.
- ^ MacDonald, Andrea (2006). "N.S. circumcisions continue to drop". Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: The Daily News (reprint: CIRP.org).
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Goel, V. (ed.) (1996). Patterns of Health Care in Ontario, 2nd edition (PDF). Canadian Medical Association. p. 295. ISBN 0-9201-6979-1.
{{cite book}}
:|first=
has generic name (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "Cultural Male Circumcision Report of Committee 2004/2005" (PDF). (Irish) Department of Health and Children.
- ^ a b "Israel teaches WHO about circumcision". ynet news. 2006.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Ku, J H (2003). "Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea: community based survey". Sex Transm Inf. 79 (1): 65–67. doi:10.1136/sti.79.1.65. PMC 1744613. PMID 12576619.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Dave, SS (2003). "Male circumcision in Britain: findings from a national probability sample survey". Sex Transm Infect. 79 (6): 499–500. doi:10.1136/sti.79.6.499. PMC 1744763. PMID 14663134.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Rickwood, AMK (2000). "Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice". BMJ. 321 (7264): 792–793. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7264.792. PMC 27490. PMID 11009516.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Denniston, G (1996). "Circumcision and the Code of Ethics". Humane Health Care International. 12: 78–80.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Wallerstein, E., Circumcision: an American Health Fallacy, New York, Springer, 1980.
- ^ Schoen, E J (2006). "Cost analysis of neonatal circumcision in a large health maintenance organization". J Urol. 175 (3 Pt 1): 1111–1115. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00399-X. PMID 16469634.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Houle, AM (2007). "Circumcision for all: the pro side". Canadian Urological Association Journal. 1 (4): 398–400. PMC 2422990. PMID 18542826.
{{cite journal}}
: More than one of|number=
and|issue=
specified (help) - ^ "Circumcision of boys: A study on international and Finnish practices" (PDF). Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. 12 February 2004. p. 8.
- ^ Ibid., p. 39.
- ^ Frisch, M (2 December 1995). "Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943-90)". BMJ. 311 (7018): 1471. PMC 2543732. PMID 8520335.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Dickson, N (2005). "Herpes simplex virus type 2 status at age 26 is not related to early circumcision in a birth cohort". Sex Transm Dis. 32 (8): 517–519. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000161296.58095.ab. PMID 16041257.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Fergusson, DM (2007). "Circumcision status and risk of sexually transmitted infection in young adult males: an analysis of a longitudinal birth cohort". Pediatrics. 118 (5): 1971–1977. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1175. PMID 17079568.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Lawrenson RA (1991). "Current practice of neonatal circumcision in the Waikato". N Z Med J. 104 (911): 184–185. PMID 1898442.
- ^ a b Richters, J (2006). "Circumcision in Australia: prevalence and effects on sexual health". Int J STD AIDS. 17 (8): 547–554. doi:10.1258/095646206778145730. PMID 16925903.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Skatssoon, Judy (2004). "Circumcision rates rise for some". Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Sydney Morning Herald (reprint: CIRP.org).
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Teutsch, Danielle (2010-02-21). "More boys go under knife as parents opt for kind cut". Sydney Morning Herald.
- ^ "Victoria to scrap public hospital circumcision". Melbourne: The Age. 2007-08-12. Retrieved 2007-08-12.
- ^ Pengelley, Jill (2007-11-12). "Cosmetic circumcision banned". The Advertiser. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
External links
- Drain, PK; Halperin, DT; Hughes, JP; Klausner, JD; Bailey, RC. (2006). "Male circumcision, religion, and infectious diseases: an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries". BMC Infect Dis. 6: 172. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-172. PMC 1764746. PMID 17137513.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|author-name-separator=
(help); Unknown parameter|author-separator=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)