Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/NonNudeExample2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Neutral'''. Nice boobs, but... well... the background is not well chosen and the composition is not that good either. [[User:Bogdangiusca|bogdan]] 18:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Neutral'''. Nice boobs, but... well... the background is not well chosen and the composition is not that good either. [[User:Bogdangiusca|bogdan]] 18:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. Just a snapshot. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 19:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. Just a snapshot. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 19:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. It's not pornography, just a picture. - [[User:JPM|JPM]] | 20:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{breakafterimages}} |
{{breakafterimages}} |
||
Revision as of 20:04, 22 February 2006
I think this picture strongly meets the requirements of WP:FPC. It illustrates the article content particularly well and it is absolutely eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. The image is public domain, created by a Wikipedian, so no problems there.
- Nominate and support. - Cyde Weys 18:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. Nice boobs, but... well... the background is not well chosen and the composition is not that good either. bogdan 18:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Just a snapshot. --Janke | Talk 19:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's not pornography, just a picture. - JPM | 20:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)