Talk:AmeriCorps VISTA: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m refactoring comment into appropriate section |
m Assess, Importance, Add or Cleanup talk page templates, formatting template/section order &general fixes using AWB (7522) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject Organizations |
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=Start |
||
|class=Start |
|||
|importance=Mid |
|importance=Mid |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States|class=Stub|importance=low}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
This Page Should be moved to [[AmeriCorps VISTA]] as that is its proper name -[[Special:Contributions/209.181.16.93|209.181.16.93]] ([[User talk:209.181.16.93|talk]]) 18:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC) |
This Page Should be moved to [[AmeriCorps VISTA]] as that is its proper name -[[Special:Contributions/209.181.16.93|209.181.16.93]] ([[User talk:209.181.16.93|talk]]) 18:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:49, 13 January 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AmeriCorps VISTA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Organizations Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
This Page Should be moved to AmeriCorps VISTA as that is its proper name -209.181.16.93 (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
seeing as these two articles cover the same entity they should probably be merged together--Shimonnyman (talk) 20:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly as written now they are highly duplicative. The only reason I could imagine for two articles is whether they try to cover 1964-1993 and 1993- separately, but I'm not sure there is any good reason to divide things up that way. So I support the merge. Kingdon (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I also support this merge. I echo Kingdon's concern about the early years, but I believe that this can be handled in a merged article. —Ost (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Logo
I added the logo so it would be in there I am unaware of the way to make an info box which would be very helpful and would be the ideal place to put the logo I am going to try and figure it out but in the meantime if someone elses knows how before i figurte it out that would be wonderful--Shimonnyman (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)