Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Weak Oppose |
m Sentence structure |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::Granted, but I would honestly say those two are stronger. Both have slightly better compositions; they both draw you into the image, and say something about the subject. Frelinghuysen just looks bored. I also note that the DOF is stronger on both of them. I agree that, in practice, portrait FPs are a little odd, but I don't think this one has the umph. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC) |
::Granted, but I would honestly say those two are stronger. Both have slightly better compositions; they both draw you into the image, and say something about the subject. Frelinghuysen just looks bored. I also note that the DOF is stronger on both of them. I agree that, in practice, portrait FPs are a little odd, but I don't think this one has the umph. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::He looks more serious then bored. Also probably beacause he had to sit still for a long time to pose he would look bored because I know I would(last part personal opinion). [[User:Spongie555|Spongie555]] ([[User talk:Spongie555|talk]]) 02:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
:::He looks more serious then bored. Also probably beacause he had to sit still for a long time to pose he would look bored because I know I would(last part personal opinion). [[User:Spongie555|Spongie555]] ([[User talk:Spongie555|talk]]) 02:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak Oppose'''. I like the portrait, but unfortunately the low DOF |
*'''Weak Oppose'''. I like the portrait, but unfortunately the low DOF removes much of the the thumbnail detail. '''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Nauticashades|Shad]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Nauticashades|es]]</font>''' 17:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 17:32, 15 January 2011
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2011 at 05:18:36 (UTC)
- Reason
- High Ev as lead image. very good for its time
- Articles in which this image appears
- Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen, List of Secretaries of State of the United States, List of United States Senators from New Jersey, 1844 Whig National Convention,
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Mathew Brady and Levin Corbin Handy
- Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, sorry. It's a bit ordinary, doesn't strike me as a particularly brilliant portrait. J Milburn (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment This image and this one are of the same nature and both are featured. Spongie555 (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Granted, but I would honestly say those two are stronger. Both have slightly better compositions; they both draw you into the image, and say something about the subject. Frelinghuysen just looks bored. I also note that the DOF is stronger on both of them. I agree that, in practice, portrait FPs are a little odd, but I don't think this one has the umph. J Milburn (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- He looks more serious then bored. Also probably beacause he had to sit still for a long time to pose he would look bored because I know I would(last part personal opinion). Spongie555 (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Granted, but I would honestly say those two are stronger. Both have slightly better compositions; they both draw you into the image, and say something about the subject. Frelinghuysen just looks bored. I also note that the DOF is stronger on both of them. I agree that, in practice, portrait FPs are a little odd, but I don't think this one has the umph. J Milburn (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I like the portrait, but unfortunately the low DOF removes much of the the thumbnail detail. NauticaShades 17:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)