Jump to content

Talk:What's Eating Gilbert Grape: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
1993: new section
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:


Why does the link to 1993 on this page go to a page on Queen Elizabeth? [[Special:Contributions/208.100.226.92|208.100.226.92]] ([[User talk:208.100.226.92|talk]]) 10:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Why does the link to 1993 on this page go to a page on Queen Elizabeth? [[Special:Contributions/208.100.226.92|208.100.226.92]] ([[User talk:208.100.226.92|talk]]) 10:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

== Quality of plot summary? ==

I've never seen the movie so I can't fix it myself but the summary is pretty poorly written. Some of the sentences don't really make sense to me, because of things like unclear reference or grammatical errors. The summary is also very long. Perhaps it can be cleaned up?

[[User:Staticat369|Staticat369]] ([[User talk:Staticat369|talk]]) 03:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:34, 17 January 2011

WikiProject iconFilm: Nordic / American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Tim Green/Mr. Lamson

Currently the article links to the Atlanta Falcons' former defensive end. However, this is not the same Tim Green-- Obviously the man in the movie's older than thirty! The Mr. Green who played Lamson has an IMDB here: http://imdb.com/name/nm0338375/

Not sure how to correct the problem, I'm not that advanced at editing/creating Wiki, but I thought it deemed mention.

~Morrigan 12.74.196.191 10:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:What's Eating Gilbert Grape poster.jpg

Image:What's Eating Gilbert Grape poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. I know i'm an @ssh0le, but this is important as any of earths other problem. What would Jesus do? He would make sure we have fair use images, thats what. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too similar to Mario?

It's always bothered me that the plot and many details of this film (and presumably, the book - written in 1991, from which it is drawn) copies too closely the plot of Mario (IMDB info on Mario), a Quebec film from 1984. Both have the older brother taking care of a mentally-challenged younger brother, both have their summers dominated by the arrival of large numbers of campers, both have the older brother falling in love with a girl in the camper crowd, both have the older brother working in a grocery store, etc...

I've never found any review or commentary on either film that refers to the other. They are so similar that one seems to be an English language remake of the other.

--Michael Daly (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Comedy-Drama?

I've never heard of this being a comedy before. All films usually have comic relief, but this one doesn't seem to have any more than usual. I think American Beauty is hilarious, for example, moreso than most drama films, but it's still labeled as just a drama. Based on film reviews and the imdb page, I'm going to chnage this to just a drama film unless anyone has objections. Tegrenath (talk) 20:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Whoa, it's comedy drama and romatnic comedy again :> Changing to something that reflects reality... 92.81.139.74 (talk) 21:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. POV much?

"a notably heartwrenching scene played beautifully by DiCaprio. " I'm removing this immediately. Tenho Karite (talk) 02:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • oh, no! hearts are ticking in such a case. He plays what is 'in a little actors soul, the devil in me_you. No mask or so called

Evita face to act on. Fine work and counting on cats!--Danaide (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is just eating cream!

  • Got no problems with the story-telling on the page. Therefore it's no Plot nesserary. Nothing additional to look for.The narrator seems clear, what is visible and when starts interpretation.For me something strange in this film irritates me. Everythig seems being told light on an easy surface.But there are many hidden conflicts in. Smile at each other, help your brother and burn down the mother#s house finally.Kids love this form of understatement. Quite normal, what happens and meet you at the corner!--Danaide (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1993

Why does the link to 1993 on this page go to a page on Queen Elizabeth? 208.100.226.92 (talk) 10:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of plot summary?

I've never seen the movie so I can't fix it myself but the summary is pretty poorly written. Some of the sentences don't really make sense to me, because of things like unclear reference or grammatical errors. The summary is also very long. Perhaps it can be cleaned up?

Staticat369 (talk) 03:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]