Talk:Ultramafic rock: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:21, 18 January 2011

Volcanoes Start‑class High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Unassessed

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ultramafic vs. ultrabasic

Ultramafic and ultrabasic are actually different terms. Ultramafic is an igneous rock which is composed of greater than 90% mafic minerals, but ultrabasic is an igneous rock which has silica content lower than 45% (weight%). First is mineralogic and second is chemical classification and they should be different articles. Rock can be ultrabasic but it doesn't mean that it should be automatically ultramafic. Siim 20:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's fairly pedantic at best. Its like saying a highly mafic-mineral rich granitoid isn't felsic because it has >10% mafic minerals. Anorthosite; since it's got >45% silica due to being >90% plagioclase, and isn't ultramafic because it's >90% 'felsic' minerals...? But it's formed by accumulation from ultramafic magmas? So I disagree with you. Ultramafic rocks are ultrabasic rocks, and arguing specifics ignores the fact that they are all hot, fairly primitive (in a fractional crystallisation sense) rocks.Rolinator 09:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ultramafic landscape in Google Street View

Here is a link to a GSV looking west from Highway 199 about 6 miles south of Cave Junction, Oregon. Notice the sparse vegetation and the exposed reddish, stony soil (glutted with magnesium but low in other nutrients). On satellite imagery the ultramafic terrain west of the highway appears as gray or reddish; the surrounding non-ultramafic areas are mostly green with dense forest. Tony (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC) http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&t=h&layer=c&cbll=42.095413,-123.682488&panoid=gzzOQ8hQbswG67omfjWMJg&cbp=11,296.15780165686965,,0,5&ll=42.095413,-123.682488&spn=0.114131,0.53627&z=11[reply]

Carbon dioxide storage?

I just read that ultramafic rock reacts with carbon dioxide to form a stable solid, and that it thus is being targeted for carbon sequestration. Does anyone have more information on this, and could add it to this article? -- Dan Griscom (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:21, 17 March 2009 edit Dtgriscom (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,432 edits →Carbon dioxide storage?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:21, 18 January 2011 edit undo Droll (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 99,518 edits m cleaned up redirect to WikiProject banner using AWB Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Volcano~~\|class=Start\|importance=High}}		{{WikiProject Volcanoes\|class=Start\|importance=High}}
	{{WikiProject Geology}}		{{WikiProject Geology}}