Jump to content

Talk:Bomb Jack: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
importance
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


: I second that. I rank it with [[Pang]] and [[Bubble Bobble]] and perhaps [[The New Zealand Story]]. It seems easy at first but it quickly becomes fiendish. The home computer versions were splendid, on a par with the home computer versions of [[Arkanoid]] for quality and playability. -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 00:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
: I second that. I rank it with [[Pang]] and [[Bubble Bobble]] and perhaps [[The New Zealand Story]]. It seems easy at first but it quickly becomes fiendish. The home computer versions were splendid, on a par with the home computer versions of [[Arkanoid]] for quality and playability. -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 00:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
::Plus Beatles doing the soundtrack. It doesn't get better than this. [[User:2fort5r|2fort5r]] ([[User talk:2fort5r|talk]]) 20:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
==Fair use rationale for Image:Bombjack1.gif==
==Fair use rationale for Image:Bombjack1.gif==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]

Revision as of 20:01, 18 January 2011

WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

THIS IS A CLASS GAME. ADDICTIVE BEYOND BELIEF. IT'S A PITY GAMES OF TODAY ARE NOT AS GOOD.

I second that. I rank it with Pang and Bubble Bobble and perhaps The New Zealand Story. It seems easy at first but it quickly becomes fiendish. The home computer versions were splendid, on a par with the home computer versions of Arkanoid for quality and playability. -Ashley Pomeroy 00:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Plus Beatles doing the soundtrack. It doesn't get better than this. 2fort5r (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bombjack1.gif

Image:Bombjack1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gameboy bombjack.png

Image:Gameboy bombjack.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]