Jump to content

User talk:Wetman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 76: Line 76:
==[[Baiae]]==
==[[Baiae]]==
Am I [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Baiae&action=historysubmit&diff=410273348&oldid=410270990 missing something]? I was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baiae&oldid=410042092#Copyright_violation pretty sure] this is a copyright violation. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 12:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Am I [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Baiae&action=historysubmit&diff=410273348&oldid=410270990 missing something]? I was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baiae&oldid=410042092#Copyright_violation pretty sure] this is a copyright violation. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 12:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

:My error. I hadn't detected the copyright violation.-[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] ([[User talk:Wetman#top|talk]]) 04:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


==Burlesque (genre)==
==Burlesque (genre)==
Hi. I see that you were the original person who created the article on Victorian theatrical burlesque [Burlesque (genre)], as distinguished from modern striptease [[burlesque]]. I see that someone has now merged the Burlesque (genre) article into [[Burlesque]]. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlesque_%28genre%29&action=history this]. I missed that there had been a merge proposal, but I disagree with this merge. Here is what [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlesque_%28genre%29&oldid=404841394 Burlesque (genre) looked like] before the merge. Would you kindly look into this and comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Burlesque#Merge_with_Burlesque_.28genre.29 here?] Thanks for taking a look and commenting either way. All the best! -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 23:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you were the original person who created the article on Victorian theatrical burlesque [Burlesque (genre)], as distinguished from modern striptease [[burlesque]]. I see that someone has now merged the Burlesque (genre) article into [[Burlesque]]. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlesque_%28genre%29&action=history this]. I missed that there had been a merge proposal, but I disagree with this merge. Here is what [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlesque_%28genre%29&oldid=404841394 Burlesque (genre) looked like] before the merge. Would you kindly look into this and comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Burlesque#Merge_with_Burlesque_.28genre.29 here?] Thanks for taking a look and commenting either way. All the best! -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 23:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

:If the combined article drops no text or illustrations and incorporates added text examining the extension of "burlesque" to include its modern connotations, that would be a genuinely encyclopedic treatment.--[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] ([[User talk:Wetman#top|talk]]) 04:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:11, 28 January 2011



This grackle has spotted you and is very pleased with your work! For having a thought provoking user page, filled with valuable instructions and examples that obviously show in the quality of your edits, I award you this Great-tailed Grackle! --User:Unfocused, 27 September 2005
To the most helpful, prolific and competent wikipedian I've met during my two years in the project. Presented by Ghirla -трёп- 17:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Epic Barnstar
For tireless vandalism reverts and all-around improvements to classical-themed articles, I

hereby award Wetman the epic barnstar Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 100 DYK Medal for Wetman
Thanks for your first hundred. Keep up the good work. With 50K plus edits then we need a few more for DYK, however we have over 100 articles so far. Thanks again Victuallers (talk) 21:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]





CURRENT & NEW TALK


Online Ambassadors

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your confidence inspires me. I've now applied.--Wetman (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very good, we are reviewing the application now Sadads (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Am I missing something? I was pretty sure this is a copyright violation. Nev1 (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My error. I hadn't detected the copyright violation.-Wetman (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Burlesque (genre)

Hi. I see that you were the original person who created the article on Victorian theatrical burlesque [Burlesque (genre)], as distinguished from modern striptease burlesque. I see that someone has now merged the Burlesque (genre) article into Burlesque. See this. I missed that there had been a merge proposal, but I disagree with this merge. Here is what Burlesque (genre) looked like before the merge. Would you kindly look into this and comment here? Thanks for taking a look and commenting either way. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the combined article drops no text or illustrations and incorporates added text examining the extension of "burlesque" to include its modern connotations, that would be a genuinely encyclopedic treatment.--Wetman (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]