Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Final Fantasy XIII/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:42, 31 January 2011

Final Fantasy XIII

Nominator(s): Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC), Pres N 20:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because it is currently a GA and after undergoing an extensive copyediting today, I am nominating this for FA status to see whether it would become a Featured Article. I believe this article is of high quality and well-suited for FA status. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am co-nominating this with Sjones; we've both spent a long time on this article and are ready to deal with any concerns that arise. We are also both in the wikicup; while that had no bearing on our work on this article courtesy demands that I let everyone know. --Pres N 20:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dab/EL check- There's no dab links, but there are ~~two~~ no dead links in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones are those? Nothing's showing up for me in the tool. --Pres N 20:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Guess I was wrong. My mistake. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think there are better sources of opinion to use than Electronic Theatre. I think you could pick a better screenshot, one that shows an enemy clearly, and maybe shows an attack. - hahnch e n 22:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot has been replaced. --Pres N 02:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per criterion 1.(b) and 1.(c); there are several essential sources that haven't been exploited to make the article truely comprehensive. See Talk:Final Fantasy XIII#Ultimania development information. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We would have to provide a translation for the Ultimania sources. We'll probably see what we can do. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that not using those sources means that the article fails 1b and 1c. For one, the sources are unusable- none of us read Japanese, and as magazine scans they aren't google-translatable. That said, regardless of that, can you prove that they contain information that should be but is not included in the article? --Pres N 20:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ::Hm. Guess I was wrong. My mistake. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 21:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' - I think there are better sources of opinion to use than Electronic Theatre.  I think you could pick a better screenshot, one that shows an enemy clearly, and maybe shows an attack. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 22:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
+:*The screenshot has been replaced. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 02:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Oppose''' as per [[WP:WIAFA|criterion 1.(b) and 1.(c)]]; there are several essential sources that haven't been exploited to make the article truely comprehensive. See [[Talk:Final Fantasy XIII#Ultimania development information]]. [[User:Jonathan Hardin&#39;|Jonathan Hardin&#39;]] ([[User talk:Jonathan Hardin&#39;|talk]]) 15:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 :We would have to provide a translation for the Ultimania sources. We'll probably see what we can do. [[Darth]] [[User:Sjones23|Sjones23]] ([[User talk:Sjones23|talk]] - [[User:Sjones23/Wikipedia contributions|contributions]]) 15:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)