Zeitgeist: Addendum: Difference between revisions
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===Part II=== |
===Part II=== |
||
Part II seeks to articulate the immorality of the profit-only motivation of corporations. Based around an interview with [[John Perkins (author)|John Perkins]], a self-described former [[Confessions of an Economic Hit Man|economic hitman]], Part II describes the |
Part II seeks to articulate the immorality of the profit-only motivation of corporations. Based around an interview with [[John Perkins (author)|John Perkins]], a self-described former [[Confessions of an Economic Hit Man|economic hitman]], Part II describes the [[Covert United States foreign regime change actions||covert involvement]] of the United States government (largely through the [[CIA]]) in the overthrow and installation of various [[dictatorship]]s in [[South America|South]] and [[Central America]]n countries. The film argues that these interventions have repeatedly been on behalf of U.S. corporate interests, while completely disregarding the interests of the people of these countries, raising accusations that the U.S. has even been known to replace democratic leaders with more despotic ones. |
||
===Part III=== |
===Part III=== |
Revision as of 18:23, 1 February 2011
Zeitgeist: Addendum | |
---|---|
Directed by | Peter Joseph |
Produced by | Peter Joseph |
Edited by | Peter Joseph |
Music by | Peter Joseph |
Distributed by | GMP LLC |
Release dates | October, 2008 |
Running time | 123 min |
Language | English |
Zeitgeist: Addendum, is a 2008 documentary film produced and directed by Peter Joseph[1], and a sequel to the 2007 film Zeitgeist: The Movie. Zeitgeist: Addendum is itself followed by the 2011 film Zeitgeist: Moving Forward.[2]
Synopsis
Addendum begins and ends with excerpts from a speech by Jiddu Krishnamurti. The remainder of the film is narrated by Peter Joseph and divided into four parts,[3] each prefaced by an on-screen quotation from a notable scholar: Krishnamurti, John Adams, Bernard Lietaer, and Thomas Paine, respectively.
Part I
Part I explains in basic terms the United States economy, stressing its recurring failures. Part I argues that a nation's creation of money and debt are viciously intertwined and necessarily irresolvable, due to the inevitable factors of interest and inflation. These factors are described as forcing the nation into an endless cycle of producing money, incurring debt, producing more money, and so on. Denouncing the United States Federal Reserve System, the film equates wage labor to slavery, ultimately claiming that the most detrimental consequence of the monetary system is its hindering of efforts toward social progress.
Part II
Part II seeks to articulate the immorality of the profit-only motivation of corporations. Based around an interview with John Perkins, a self-described former economic hitman, Part II describes the |covert involvement of the United States government (largely through the CIA) in the overthrow and installation of various dictatorships in South and Central American countries. The film argues that these interventions have repeatedly been on behalf of U.S. corporate interests, while completely disregarding the interests of the people of these countries, raising accusations that the U.S. has even been known to replace democratic leaders with more despotic ones.
Part III
Part III begins with descriptions of various forms of largely unexplored renewable power, including solar, wave, tidal, wind, and geothermal energy. Part III then introduces the The Venus Project, Jacque Fresco and Roxanne Meadows’s vision of a technocracy movement, and interviews the two founders on their ideas. The Venus Project is presented as a wide-ranging solution to many social problems. The project emphasizes major scientific and engineering advances without any profit motive, natural resource management along with improved energy efficiency, and abandonment of the monetary system in favor of a resource-based economy.[4]
Part IV
Part IV explores the idea that all major social problems are ultimately the result of wide-scale ignorance concerning the two concepts of emergence and symbiosis—an ignorance maintained by the political, monetary, and religious institutions. The film maintains a cosmopolitan attitude, stating that humans are part of an interdependent universe. Several means of social change are finally suggested to oppose rigid social institutions, largely via non-violent boycotting and educating. The film concludes in a sequence depicting actors as members of the fast-paced modern world suddenly stopping in their everyday activities and letting go of various symbolic items of corporate, religious, and materialistic significance.
See also
References
- ^ TZMOfficialChannel's Zeitgeist Addendum
- ^ http://www.usnewssource.com/headlines/zeitgeist-moving-forward-movie-hits-the-internet_148126.html
- ^ Zeitgeist: Addendum at the Sarasota – Manatee Hebraic Roots Forum, accessed January 31, 2011
- ^ http://www.independent.com/news/2011/jan/19/marjorie-luke-hosts-new-emzeitgeistem-film/