Talk:Taiwan High Speed Rail/GA2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rontombontom (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Sp33dyphil (talk | contribs) repsonse |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*"for other stations. For Southbound trains" there shouldn't be capital letter for southbound. |
*"for other stations. For Southbound trains" there shouldn't be capital letter for southbound. |
||
*:Done. --[[User:Rontombontom|Rontombontom]] ([[User talk:Rontombontom|talk]]) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
*:Done. --[[User:Rontombontom|Rontombontom]] ([[User talk:Rontombontom|talk]]) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
::* OK, got it. I thought odd here means "strange". :) |
|||
*"Train frequency was ramped up progressively from an initial 38 per day." source? |
*"Train frequency was ramped up progressively from an initial 38 per day." source? |
||
| Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
*This is only a minor request, the Commons link could be better positioned under "External links" rather than "Further reading". |
*This is only a minor request, the Commons link could be better positioned under "External links" rather than "Further reading". |
||
*:If find it is even a guideline: [[WP:LAYOUT]] says so. Done. --23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
*:If find it is even a guideline: [[WP:LAYOUT]] says so. Done. --23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
*::Thanks for the new link. |
|||
The article is really well referenced. With some polishing, copy editing, and some small elaborations and trimming, this article could become a FAC. |
The article is really well referenced. With some polishing, copy editing, and some small elaborations and trimming, this article could become a FAC. |
||
: Being relatively new to the article rating stuff (this is the first article I nominated for GA), I have to ask: what is and where do I find the conditions for a "FAC" rating? (I or another editor will look at the rest of the criticisms tomorrow.) --[[User:Rontombontom|Rontombontom]] ([[User talk:Rontombontom|talk]]) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
: Being relatively new to the article rating stuff (this is the first article I nominated for GA), I have to ask: what is and where do I find the conditions for a "FAC" rating? (I or another editor will look at the rest of the criticisms tomorrow.) --[[User:Rontombontom|Rontombontom]] ([[User talk:Rontombontom|talk]]) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
::[[WP:Featured article criteria]] |
|||
Revision as of 00:58, 2 February 2011
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (T • C • I love Wikipedia!) 22:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- For the table under "Ridership", there should be an "s" after "5 minute"
- Done. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- There are a number of one-sentence paragraphs which could be elaborated or and merged with other paragraphs.
- Taiwan, Trains and Transport portal links could be added.
- This page tells me that there are no dead refs, which is quite surprising given the number of refs there are.
- There are editors keeping a watch on those links :-) ...which are numerous, but most come from a handful of sites. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- What are the Executive Yuan and Legislative Yuan? Some quick definitions could be included.
- Done. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- The words "maker" in "main maker of the French TGV, and Siemens, the main maker of the German ICE." could be replaced with the more-appropriate "manufacturer".
- Done. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- "Southbound trains are designated by odd train numbers. Northbound trains have the same numbering scheme, but have even train numbers" – according to whom? Please explain why it's odd?
- Odd an even numbers, that is non-divisible and divisible by two, as in: Parity (mathematics). Added a wikilink. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- "for other stations. For Southbound trains" there shouldn't be capital letter for southbound.
- Done. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK, got it. I thought odd here means "strange". :)
- "Train frequency was ramped up progressively from an initial 38 per day." source?
- I added the source for the initial 38 per day; but this sentence summarizes the data in the frequency diagram, which is fully sourced on its Wikimedia Commons page. --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- This is only a minor request, the Commons link could be better positioned under "External links" rather than "Further reading".
- If find it is even a guideline: WP:LAYOUT says so. Done. --23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the new link.
- If find it is even a guideline: WP:LAYOUT says so. Done. --23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The article is really well referenced. With some polishing, copy editing, and some small elaborations and trimming, this article could become a FAC.
- Being relatively new to the article rating stuff (this is the first article I nominated for GA), I have to ask: what is and where do I find the conditions for a "FAC" rating? (I or another editor will look at the rest of the criticisms tomorrow.) --Rontombontom (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)