Talk:We Came as Romans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:41, 6 February 2011

Metal Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Biography: Musicians Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Plz notice... We came as Romans has definitely to be classified as Post-Hardcore, not as Metalcore, there is a little diffrence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.149.84.169 (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing a former member Mark the old vocalist. Mark gone, dave from guitar to vocals, lou joins guitar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.35.71 (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More Info

If you have something to share about the band put it here. Please add more stuff and try to refrain from removing stuff.

Creditability

Can we let this page be, I worked real hard on it. If anyone has anything to add please add it, but don't delete it. If something should be fixed let me know and I will work on it quickly.

Then you need to explain why they are notable and worthy of an article on Wikipedia. Read Wikipedia:Notability (music) for the criteria to be met. NtheP (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i was unaware of that, i am working to fix that. . Give me some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gart99 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)<> [reply]

Am i getting close? I feel that it should stay. They are signed to a big name record company and a big name producer and are well known in the hardcore/christian music world. And november 3rd they will have one album and two EPs out.

Well thats about all i can think of, feel free to edit it on your own. I am new to this so the formating might be off a little. If someone would like to remove the speedy deletion thing that would be great. If you dont feel like it should be removed please share your concerns.

"Christian Band Debate"

This really should be re-written...

They are not a Christian band yet spends a significant amount of time talking about love and hoping people change the way they act because of it.^[1] When asked if they were a Christian band, their guitarist replied, ""We have Christian dudes in our band and we have non-Christian dudes in our band, and as a whole, we're not a Christian band. We definitely get it, but we also get it a lot because our music, as a whole, has a positive message to it, and there aren't a whole lot of bands with a positive message who aren't Christian bands. Typically, its just Christian bands who promote a positive message. Just because we have a message, and its not about killing each other, we get the Christian band tag.^[2]"

Genre war.

What is going on here?!?!?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DCcomicslover (talk • contribs) 19:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also seeing this from my recent changes patrol. They might well be emo-pop beloved of scene kids. To the anonymous users putting this information up: if this is so, let's have some citations and less argumentative, non-encyclopedic text to support it. --Slashme (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emo, pop music... oh please, obvious troll is obvious.86.160.119.135 (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, they are emo pop. Classifying them as "post-hardcore" - i.e. same genre as Fugazi, Helmet and Jesus Lizard - is a crime against music history, and might very well be seen as trolling - if that's what you meant.

[1] ttp://www.antimusic.com/news/09/sep/25We_Came_As_Romans_Debut.shtml WCAR at ANTIMUSIC

[2] ttp://www.noisecreep.com/2009/11/12/we-came-as-romans-christian

[1]

[2]

Revision as of 06:10, 5 February 2011 edit 86.160.119.135 (talk) →Genre war. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:41, 6 February 2011 edit undo 178.68.27.112 (talk) →Genre war. Next edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Emo, pop music... oh please, obvious troll is obvious.[[Special:Contributions/86.160.119.135\|86.160.119.135]] ([[User talk:86.160.119.135\|talk]]) 06:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)		Emo, pop music... oh please, obvious troll is obvious.[[Special:Contributions/86.160.119.135\|86.160.119.135]] ([[User talk:86.160.119.135\|talk]]) 06:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

			Sure, they are emo pop. Classifying them as "post-hardcore" - i.e. same genre as Fugazi, Helmet and Jesus Lizard - is a crime against music history, and might very well be seen as trolling - if that's what you meant.