Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fupa: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::::I doubt it's widespread, which is why I voted delete. [[User:Royboycrashfan|<font color="#4169E1">'''Roy'''al Blue</font>]] <font color="#166D88">[[User talk:Royboycrashfan|<sup>T</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Royboycrashfan|<sub>C</sub>]]</font> 03:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
:::::I doubt it's widespread, which is why I voted delete. [[User:Royboycrashfan|<font color="#4169E1">'''Roy'''al Blue</font>]] <font color="#166D88">[[User talk:Royboycrashfan|<sup>T</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Royboycrashfan|<sub>C</sub>]]</font> 03:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I've certainly heard this term as well, but I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia, as it is essentially an Urban Dicdef. --<font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. I've certainly heard this term as well, but I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia, as it is essentially an Urban Dicdef. --<font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
*Mild '''delete'''. The slang term has been around for a few years, and didn't originate from the article's author, but the article doesn't really add anything. [[User:Mike Church|Mike Church]] 04:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:36, 26 February 2006
Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day Booyabazooka 03:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Original research. Bobby1011 03:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Booya, I've seen people use this term on other websites, but it still doesn't make a good article. A redirect could be the answer (though I'm not sure what to), but I'm leaning towards delete right now. Royal Blue T/C 03:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree that I may have tagged it wrong in my deletion vote, but it still strikes me as a neologism. I wouldn't put it in a dictionary, and certainly not an encyclopedia. ~ Booyabazooka 03:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Where should it redirect to? Internet slang? Bobby1011 03:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps. It does make sense. Royal Blue T/C 03:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I would be more apt to add it to List of Internet slang, and redirect there... if it warrants being on that list. But I'm not sure... is this term really Internet-specific? And how widespread is it? ~ Booyabazooka 03:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I doubt it's widespread, which is why I voted delete. Royal Blue T/C 03:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I would be more apt to add it to List of Internet slang, and redirect there... if it warrants being on that list. But I'm not sure... is this term really Internet-specific? And how widespread is it? ~ Booyabazooka 03:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps. It does make sense. Royal Blue T/C 03:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Where should it redirect to? Internet slang? Bobby1011 03:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I've certainly heard this term as well, but I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia, as it is essentially an Urban Dicdef. --Kinu t/c 04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Mild delete. The slang term has been around for a few years, and didn't originate from the article's author, but the article doesn't really add anything. Mike Church 04:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)