Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOM: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:32, 26 February 2006

Delete, it's a neologism dab page. Royal Blue ^T/_C 03:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Makes not sense to me anyway. Bobby1011 03:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable neologism. The shameless blogvertising seals the deal. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - article was originally a redirect to Opium, which is (apparently) sometimes referred to as "God's Own Medicine". dbtfz ^talk 06:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but revert to version of 25 September 2005 -- intended as a correct TLA disambig page mervyn 08:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boldly reverted. Royboy crashfan

Keep/revert as per mervyn -- Astrokey44|talk 15:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete simpliciter. No infomration here worth keeping. · rodii · 19:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is now (again) a legitimate disambiguation page. dbtfz ^talk 22:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Keep'''/revert as per mervyn -- [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]]<small>|[[User talk:Astrokey44|talk]]</small> 15:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' ''simpliciter''. No infomration here worth keeping. <b><span style="color: #f33"> &middot; [[User talk:Rodii|<span style="color: #666"> rodii </span>]] &middot; </span></b> 19:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' as it is now (again) a legitimate disambiguation page.  [[User:Dbtfz|<font color="maroon">dbtfz</font>]][[User talk:Dbtfz|<sup><font color="slategray">talk</font></sup>]] 22:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)